37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 263435 |
Time | |
Date | 199402 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : gsh |
State Reference | IN |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : sbn tracon : day |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller supervisory : 15 |
ASRS Report | 263435 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | other personnel other |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : required legal separation non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other other : unspecified atc |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 18000 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
While investigating an aircraft accident at the goshen airport, the air traffic manager determined I was a contributory factor in an operational error. It was determined that non radar separation should have been applied to an aircraft Y arriving at the goshen airport behind another aircraft X landing at the goshen airport. It was determined that paragraph 5-70 (radar separation) of the 7110.65 could not be used, in lieu of paragraph 4-100 (non radar). Though radar coverage exists at the missed approach point, radar contact was lost with the first aircraft and had not verified on the ground or canceled IFR, or reported missed approach. This facility for 20 yrs has used radar separation at this airport per paragraph 5-70 based on the radar coverage. Paragraphs 5-70, 501 note, 10-40, 5-13 need to be more specific, reference radar coverage. Additionally define radar contact lost specifically.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACFT Y HAD LTSS FROM ACFT X WHILE ON APCH. SYS ERROR.
Narrative: WHILE INVESTIGATING AN ACFT ACCIDENT AT THE GOSHEN ARPT, THE AIR TFC MGR DETERMINED I WAS A CONTRIBUTORY FACTOR IN AN OPERROR. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT NON RADAR SEPARATION SHOULD HAVE BEEN APPLIED TO AN ACFT Y ARRIVING AT THE GOSHEN ARPT BEHIND ANOTHER ACFT X LNDG AT THE GOSHEN ARPT. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT PARAGRAPH 5-70 (RADAR SEPARATION) OF THE 7110.65 COULD NOT BE USED, IN LIEU OF PARAGRAPH 4-100 (NON RADAR). THOUGH RADAR COVERAGE EXISTS AT THE MISSED APCH POINT, RADAR CONTACT WAS LOST WITH THE FIRST ACFT AND HAD NOT VERIFIED ON THE GND OR CANCELED IFR, OR RPTED MISSED APCH. THIS FACILITY FOR 20 YRS HAS USED RADAR SEPARATION AT THIS ARPT PER PARAGRAPH 5-70 BASED ON THE RADAR COVERAGE. PARAGRAPHS 5-70, 501 NOTE, 10-40, 5-13 NEED TO BE MORE SPECIFIC, REF RADAR COVERAGE. ADDITIONALLY DEFINE RADAR CONTACT LOST SPECIFICALLY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.