Narrative:

Following an ah-rs failure and vectors for a 'return' landing we descended 800 ft below our assigned altitude (note: pitch control ah-rs) was a factor. There was no conflict of traffic and we were following an A300 heavy to the active runway with visual contact. It may be noted that after ah-rs 2 was selected and the pitch difference between ca/first officer resolved, 20 degrees versus 8 degrees, altitude control was no problem at all. The items lost in this failure were 1) altitude information on captain side (pitch), 2) command bars, 3) heading bars, 4) autoplt, 5) yaw dampener. All cockpit resource management procedures were used and the result was a very normal return and landing. Strongly recommend cockpit resource management to all!

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN ACR LTT HAD AN ALT DEV ATTRIBUTABLE TO AN AH-RS FAILURE.

Narrative: FOLLOWING AN AH-RS FAILURE AND VECTORS FOR A 'RETURN' LNDG WE DSNDED 800 FT BELOW OUR ASSIGNED ALT (NOTE: PITCH CTL AH-RS) WAS A FACTOR. THERE WAS NO CONFLICT OF TFC AND WE WERE FOLLOWING AN A300 HVY TO THE ACTIVE RWY WITH VISUAL CONTACT. IT MAY BE NOTED THAT AFTER AH-RS 2 WAS SELECTED AND THE PITCH DIFFERENCE BTWN CA/FO RESOLVED, 20 DEGS VERSUS 8 DEGS, ALT CTL WAS NO PROB AT ALL. THE ITEMS LOST IN THIS FAILURE WERE 1) ALT INFO ON CAPT SIDE (PITCH), 2) COMMAND BARS, 3) HDG BARS, 4) AUTOPLT, 5) YAW DAMPENER. ALL COCKPIT RESOURCE MGMNT PROCS WERE USED AND THE RESULT WAS A VERY NORMAL RETURN AND LNDG. STRONGLY RECOMMEND COCKPIT RESOURCE MGMNT TO ALL!

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.