37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 268639 |
Time | |
Date | 199404 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ewr |
State Reference | NJ |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | ATR 42 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | ground other : taxi landing other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 265 flight time total : 11300 flight time type : 4700 |
ASRS Report | 268639 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : unable |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
The first officer was flying and made a normal landing on runway 22L at ewr. He slowed the aircraft using normal braking. The first officer transferred control of the aircraft and I accepted at the usual point for use of the steering tiller for clearing the runway and taxi to the ramp. This event occurred during one of the many 'rush hours' at the ewr and the tower controller asked us to expedite clearing of the runway for traffic on short final behind us. I angled the aircraft toward taxiway G, a 90 degree intersection, our first available exit from the runway and a usual exit point for this aircraft, especially considering we were at least 8000 pounds under maximum gross landing weight. To expedite clearing, I entered the turn at a maximum acceptable speed. As I pushed the brake pedals, they bottomed out with no brake application. My immediate reaction was to observe that all 3 hydraulic pressure gauges showed normal system pressures. The first officer realized I have no brakes and tried his brake pedals with the same consequence. I considered our speed too high to safely execute a tighter turn and therefore we were unable to complete the turn onto the taxiway. The nosewheel left the pavement and shortly brought us to a complete stop. We had to be towed back onto the pavement. Within several hours our maintenance department had determined that there was no hydraulic pressure to the brakes but had been unable to determine the cause. A possible way to have avoided the incident would have been to by-pass the first available exit from the runway, 90 degree 'G' and turned at the next taxiway, a 'high- speed' exit. Use of taxiway 'G' is not a unreasonable expectation, even at maximum gross landing weight, and would have been uneventful in this situation without the interruption of the yet to be determined malfunction.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TXWY EXCURSION AFTER LOSS OF ACFT CTL.
Narrative: THE FO WAS FLYING AND MADE A NORMAL LNDG ON RWY 22L AT EWR. HE SLOWED THE ACFT USING NORMAL BRAKING. THE FO TRANSFERRED CTL OF THE ACFT AND I ACCEPTED AT THE USUAL POINT FOR USE OF THE STEERING TILLER FOR CLRING THE RWY AND TAXI TO THE RAMP. THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING ONE OF THE MANY 'RUSH HRS' AT THE EWR AND THE TWR CTLR ASKED US TO EXPEDITE CLRING OF THE RWY FOR TFC ON SHORT FINAL BEHIND US. I ANGLED THE ACFT TOWARD TXWY G, A 90 DEG INTXN, OUR FIRST AVAILABLE EXIT FROM THE RWY AND A USUAL EXIT POINT FOR THIS ACFT, ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING WE WERE AT LEAST 8000 LBS UNDER MAXIMUM GROSS LNDG WT. TO EXPEDITE CLRING, I ENTERED THE TURN AT A MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE SPD. AS I PUSHED THE BRAKE PEDALS, THEY BOTTOMED OUT WITH NO BRAKE APPLICATION. MY IMMEDIATE REACTION WAS TO OBSERVE THAT ALL 3 HYD PRESSURE GAUGES SHOWED NORMAL SYS PRESSURES. THE FO REALIZED I HAVE NO BRAKES AND TRIED HIS BRAKE PEDALS WITH THE SAME CONSEQUENCE. I CONSIDERED OUR SPD TOO HIGH TO SAFELY EXECUTE A TIGHTER TURN AND THEREFORE WE WERE UNABLE TO COMPLETE THE TURN ONTO THE TXWY. THE NOSEWHEEL LEFT THE PAVEMENT AND SHORTLY BROUGHT US TO A COMPLETE STOP. WE HAD TO BE TOWED BACK ONTO THE PAVEMENT. WITHIN SEVERAL HRS OUR MAINT DEPT HAD DETERMINED THAT THERE WAS NO HYD PRESSURE TO THE BRAKES BUT HAD BEEN UNABLE TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE. A POSSIBLE WAY TO HAVE AVOIDED THE INCIDENT WOULD HAVE BEEN TO BY-PASS THE FIRST AVAILABLE EXIT FROM THE RWY, 90 DEG 'G' AND TURNED AT THE NEXT TXWY, A 'HIGH- SPD' EXIT. USE OF TXWY 'G' IS NOT A UNREASONABLE EXPECTATION, EVEN AT MAXIMUM GROSS LNDG WT, AND WOULD HAVE BEEN UNEVENTFUL IN THIS SIT WITHOUT THE INTERRUPTION OF THE YET TO BE DETERMINED MALFUNCTION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.