37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 277850 |
Time | |
Date | 199407 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ewr |
State Reference | NJ |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 10000 msl bound upper : 11000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : n90 tower : day |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 60 flight time total : 8000 flight time type : 40 |
ASRS Report | 277850 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 15000 flight time type : 4000 |
ASRS Report | 278121 |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
After departing runway 22R at ewr we were handed off to departure control and assigned a heading of 220 degrees and told to climb to 10000 ft. We were on that heading for about 20 mi and noticed that the controller was not talking to us. The PF (captain) noticed that the TCASII display was 'blank.' he queried the controller about our heading assigned. The controller was very busy with an aircraft that was 5 mi off course. The captain realized that the transponder was still in the standby mode. He turned it on and the controller told us to turn right to 360 degrees and climb to 11000 ft immediately. We received a TCASII RA and visually idented the target. I, PNF, was responsible for turning on the transponder during the before takeoff checklist I read the item (command) and responded but failed to turn it on. Due to my lack of experience as a first officer, I was an flight engineer for the airline for 4 yrs. I had not developed a 'flow' yet for the checklist items. I am on reserve duty and the last time I flew was 7 days prior. I had a total of 28:40 hours in type and as a first officer this lack of flying was a contributing factor. I was still 'rusty' because of the infrequency of regularly flying trips (all reserve pilots). I think the company should buy me a couple of months worth of trips to bring me up to speed and keep me from getting complacent. We talked to a TRACON supervisor about the incident and he said he was vaguely familiar with said incident. He said there was no violation of separation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC NEGLECTS TO MOVE XPONDER FROM STANDBY.
Narrative: AFTER DEPARTING RWY 22R AT EWR WE WERE HANDED OFF TO DEP CTL AND ASSIGNED A HDG OF 220 DEGS AND TOLD TO CLB TO 10000 FT. WE WERE ON THAT HDG FOR ABOUT 20 MI AND NOTICED THAT THE CTLR WAS NOT TALKING TO US. THE PF (CAPT) NOTICED THAT THE TCASII DISPLAY WAS 'BLANK.' HE QUERIED THE CTLR ABOUT OUR HDG ASSIGNED. THE CTLR WAS VERY BUSY WITH AN ACFT THAT WAS 5 MI OFF COURSE. THE CAPT REALIZED THAT THE XPONDER WAS STILL IN THE STANDBY MODE. HE TURNED IT ON AND THE CTLR TOLD US TO TURN R TO 360 DEGS AND CLB TO 11000 FT IMMEDIATELY. WE RECEIVED A TCASII RA AND VISUALLY IDENTED THE TARGET. I, PNF, WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR TURNING ON THE XPONDER DURING THE BEFORE TKOF CHKLIST I READ THE ITEM (COMMAND) AND RESPONDED BUT FAILED TO TURN IT ON. DUE TO MY LACK OF EXPERIENCE AS A FO, I WAS AN FE FOR THE AIRLINE FOR 4 YRS. I HAD NOT DEVELOPED A 'FLOW' YET FOR THE CHKLIST ITEMS. I AM ON RESERVE DUTY AND THE LAST TIME I FLEW WAS 7 DAYS PRIOR. I HAD A TOTAL OF 28:40 HRS IN TYPE AND AS A FO THIS LACK OF FLYING WAS A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR. I WAS STILL 'RUSTY' BECAUSE OF THE INFREQUENCY OF REGULARLY FLYING TRIPS (ALL RESERVE PLTS). I THINK THE COMPANY SHOULD BUY ME A COUPLE OF MONTHS WORTH OF TRIPS TO BRING ME UP TO SPD AND KEEP ME FROM GETTING COMPLACENT. WE TALKED TO A TRACON SUPVR ABOUT THE INCIDENT AND HE SAID HE WAS VAGUELY FAMILIAR WITH SAID INCIDENT. HE SAID THERE WAS NO VIOLATION OF SEPARATION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.