37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 282937 |
Time | |
Date | 199409 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sbp |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zla |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Jetstream 31 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | cruise other descent : approach descent other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Metro Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : go around |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 5100 flight time type : 1100 |
ASRS Report | 282937 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
In summary: 2 light transport air carrier aircraft were launched from lax to sbp at night. The reporting aircraft was a few mins to the rear and had the lead aircraft in sight until nearing the sbp traffic pattern. Sbp is uncontrolled at the time of the air carrier's arrival. Nearing sbp, both aircraft were sent to the sbp CTAF, in turn, by ZLA. The reporting aircraft lost sight of the lead aircraft. The reporting aircraft planned a straight-in approach to runway 29 and assumed that the lead aircraft would do the same. The reporting aircraft made all of the proper traffic pattern calls. As they heard no replies from the lead aircraft, the reporting aircraft assumed that the lead aircraft was on the ground. Actually, the lead aircraft had not made a straight-in approach and was now behind the reporting aircraft and was forced to go around.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: 2 ACR LTTS HAD AN NMAC AT A NON TWR ARPT CTAF.
Narrative: IN SUMMARY: 2 LTT ACR ACFT WERE LAUNCHED FROM LAX TO SBP AT NIGHT. THE RPTING ACFT WAS A FEW MINS TO THE REAR AND HAD THE LEAD ACFT IN SIGHT UNTIL NEARING THE SBP TFC PATTERN. SBP IS UNCTLED AT THE TIME OF THE ACR'S ARR. NEARING SBP, BOTH ACFT WERE SENT TO THE SBP CTAF, IN TURN, BY ZLA. THE RPTING ACFT LOST SIGHT OF THE LEAD ACFT. THE RPTING ACFT PLANNED A STRAIGHT-IN APCH TO RWY 29 AND ASSUMED THAT THE LEAD ACFT WOULD DO THE SAME. THE RPTING ACFT MADE ALL OF THE PROPER TFC PATTERN CALLS. AS THEY HEARD NO REPLIES FROM THE LEAD ACFT, THE RPTING ACFT ASSUMED THAT THE LEAD ACFT WAS ON THE GND. ACTUALLY, THE LEAD ACFT HAD NOT MADE A STRAIGHT-IN APCH AND WAS NOW BEHIND THE RPTING ACFT AND WAS FORCED TO GAR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.