37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 287248 |
Time | |
Date | 199410 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ito |
State Reference | HI |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 1000 agl bound upper : 1500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : n90 |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Helicopter |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | cruise other descent other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Helicopter |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | other personnel |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 10 flight time total : 22000 flight time type : 17000 |
ASRS Report | 287248 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action other |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 300 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
I was notified by mr a on oct/xx/94 that he had to fly below 1500 ft AGL while on a tour due to winds, reduced visibility and aircraft avoidance. This descent, as described, was a completely safe maneuver, however, he did fly below the minimum altitude which the new sfar-71 requires. Mr a is an exceptional pilot who had the safety of his passenger in mind. I have reiterated to mr a to fly in accordance with sfar- 71 at all times unless a deviation is necessary for safety purposes. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter states both reports involve the same type of situation. There was a mist and volcano activity so visibility was poor. Pilot heard another pilot giving position report in same area but could not see him. The descent was precautionary to avoid an near midair collision. The pali winds blow over the top of the volcano and the helicopters are placed in a great deal of turbulence at sfr altitude required. When down low, they do not get into this turbulence and poor visibility. Reporter states the NTSB has come out with a letter stating the sfar-71 requirements create an unsafe situation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: NMAC IN SFAR-71 AIRSPACE.
Narrative: I WAS NOTIFIED BY MR A ON OCT/XX/94 THAT HE HAD TO FLY BELOW 1500 FT AGL WHILE ON A TOUR DUE TO WINDS, REDUCED VISIBILITY AND ACFT AVOIDANCE. THIS DSCNT, AS DESCRIBED, WAS A COMPLETELY SAFE MANEUVER, HOWEVER, HE DID FLY BELOW THE MINIMUM ALT WHICH THE NEW SFAR-71 REQUIRES. MR A IS AN EXCEPTIONAL PLT WHO HAD THE SAFETY OF HIS PAX IN MIND. I HAVE REITERATED TO MR A TO FLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAR- 71 AT ALL TIMES UNLESS A DEV IS NECESSARY FOR SAFETY PURPOSES. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATES BOTH REPORTS INVOLVE THE SAME TYPE OF SIT. THERE WAS A MIST AND VOLCANO ACTIVITY SO VISIBILITY WAS POOR. PLT HEARD ANOTHER PLT GIVING POS RPT IN SAME AREA BUT COULD NOT SEE HIM. THE DSCNT WAS PRECAUTIONARY TO AVOID AN NMAC. THE PALI WINDS BLOW OVER THE TOP OF THE VOLCANO AND THE HELIS ARE PLACED IN A GREAT DEAL OF TURB AT SFR ALT REQUIRED. WHEN DOWN LOW, THEY DO NOT GET INTO THIS TURB AND POOR VISIBILITY. RPTR STATES THE NTSB HAS COME OUT WITH A LETTER STATING THE SFAR-71 REQUIREMENTS CREATE AN UNSAFE SIT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.