37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 292819 |
Time | |
Date | 199501 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : las |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 7000 msl bound upper : 7000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : las |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : commercial pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 275 flight time total : 13000 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 292819 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : overcame equipment problem other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
We were on approach into las in WX at night. I was flying as first officer and I was also the PF. Las approach control was vectoring us south of the airport at 7000 ft for an ILS to runway 25L. Initially we were vectored on a heading of 090 degrees. Then approach said he could not fit us in behind the expected aircraft and told us to turn right to heading 110 degrees and expect to be sequenced onto final in the next 'slot' at this time we were about a mi southeast of the airports at an assigned speed of 170 KTS. We proceeded to a point about 20 mi southeast of the airport expecting a turn to final at any time. I started to get concerned about our distance from the airport and to non communication from approach control although we could hear them talking to other aircraft. Then it occurred to me that the voice we heard was not communicating appropriate messages for approach control. I realized it must be tower frequency. I queried the captain and we both realized immediately that the selector switch for the communication radio had inadvertently been switched from approach control frequency to tower frequency. The captain immediately switched back to approach frequency. As he did so approach control was querying us as to hearing his frequency. The captain acknowledged we heard and briefly explained why we were off frequency. Approach turned us immediately to the northwest to join the localizer. The approach was completed without further incident. Factors contributing to the situation were the proximity of the radio 'rocker' switch to the gear horn silencing button. Evidently, while the captain was anticipating the horn and pressing the silence button as I reduced power, he hit the radio switch. As far as other factors are concerned, once again it is shown that one has to be extremely vigilant when on radar vectors for approach for lost communication.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CAPT INADVERTENTLY SWITCHED COM FREQ TO TWR PREMATURELY WHEN SILENCING THE GEAR WARNING HORN DURING APCH VECTORS RESULTING IN LOST COM WITH APCH.
Narrative: WE WERE ON APCH INTO LAS IN WX AT NIGHT. I WAS FLYING AS FO AND I WAS ALSO THE PF. LAS APCH CTL WAS VECTORING US S OF THE ARPT AT 7000 FT FOR AN ILS TO RWY 25L. INITIALLY WE WERE VECTORED ON A HDG OF 090 DEGS. THEN APCH SAID HE COULD NOT FIT US IN BEHIND THE EXPECTED ACFT AND TOLD US TO TURN RIGHT TO HDG 110 DEGS AND EXPECT TO BE SEQUENCED ONTO FINAL IN THE NEXT 'SLOT' AT THIS TIME WE WERE ABOUT A MI SE OF THE ARPTS AT AN ASSIGNED SPD OF 170 KTS. WE PROCEEDED TO A POINT ABOUT 20 MI SE OF THE ARPT EXPECTING A TURN TO FINAL AT ANY TIME. I STARTED TO GET CONCERNED ABOUT OUR DISTANCE FROM THE ARPT AND TO NON COM FROM APCH CTL ALTHOUGH WE COULD HEAR THEM TALKING TO OTHER ACFT. THEN IT OCCURRED TO ME THAT THE VOICE WE HEARD WAS NOT COMMUNICATING APPROPRIATE MESSAGES FOR APCH CTL. I REALIZED IT MUST BE TWR FREQ. I QUERIED THE CAPT AND WE BOTH REALIZED IMMEDIATELY THAT THE SELECTOR SWITCH FOR THE COM RADIO HAD INADVERTENTLY BEEN SWITCHED FROM APCH CTL FREQ TO TWR FREQ. THE CAPT IMMEDIATELY SWITCHED BACK TO APCH FREQ. AS HE DID SO APCH CTL WAS QUERYING US AS TO HEARING HIS FREQ. THE CAPT ACKNOWLEDGED WE HEARD AND BRIEFLY EXPLAINED WHY WE WERE OFF FREQ. APCH TURNED US IMMEDIATELY TO THE NW TO JOIN THE LOC. THE APCH WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO THE SIT WERE THE PROX OF THE RADIO 'ROCKER' SWITCH TO THE GEAR HORN SILENCING BUTTON. EVIDENTLY, WHILE THE CAPT WAS ANTICIPATING THE HORN AND PRESSING THE SILENCE BUTTON AS I REDUCED PWR, HE HIT THE RADIO SWITCH. AS FAR AS OTHER FACTORS ARE CONCERNED, ONCE AGAIN IT IS SHOWN THAT ONE HAS TO BE EXTREMELY VIGILANT WHEN ON RADAR VECTORS FOR APCH FOR LOST COM.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.