Narrative:

Experienced smoke in cabin due to overheated airconditioner pack, shut it off, smoke subsided. I failed to notify FAA immediately (as per flight operation manual) because the problem was idented, corrected, and the aircraft was 'quick turned' to get back on schedule. Also because captain was unaware the immediate notification of the FAA, was required. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter states that maintenance came and checked the aircraft, made the proper logbook entries prior to there departure. When dispatch was contacted it was indicated that they would take care of the paperwork involved. Reporter was just covering himself with this report so that nothing would 'come back to haunt him.'

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: LGT HAS SMOKE IN CABIN FROM OVERHEATED AIRCONDITIONING PACK.

Narrative: EXPERIENCED SMOKE IN CABIN DUE TO OVERHEATED AIRCONDITIONER PACK, SHUT IT OFF, SMOKE SUBSIDED. I FAILED TO NOTIFY FAA IMMEDIATELY (AS PER FLT OP MANUAL) BECAUSE THE PROB WAS IDENTED, CORRECTED, AND THE ACFT WAS 'QUICK TURNED' TO GET BACK ON SCHEDULE. ALSO BECAUSE CAPT WAS UNAWARE THE IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION OF THE FAA, WAS REQUIRED. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATES THAT MAINT CAME AND CHKED THE ACFT, MADE THE PROPER LOGBOOK ENTRIES PRIOR TO THERE DEP. WHEN DISPATCH WAS CONTACTED IT WAS INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD TAKE CARE OF THE PAPERWORK INVOLVED. RPTR WAS JUST COVERING HIMSELF WITH THIS RPT SO THAT NOTHING WOULD 'COME BACK TO HAUNT HIM.'

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.