Narrative:

Landing was firm. Had declined offer for no ILS, visual tailwind landing on runway 24 on mco-rsw leg. Declined and shot visual to runway 06 with ILS backup. Stabilized approach to touchdown. Picked up sink rate (apparently) during transition to visual. Due to 'black hole' with no peripheral cues, did not recognize sink rate until near touchdown. Landing was firm but not hard. No masks dropped. Few passenger commented about landing but nothing unusual. 2 days later, a passenger tells air carrier his back was injured during landing. In addition to lack of visual cues, we were in 13TH hour of scheduled 12 hour duty day after short layover. Fatigue may have also been a factor. Upon reflection, it could have been a late flare due to some visual problems. I recall that last look at vsi indicated normal rate of descent.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PAX ALLEGES RPTR'S HARD LNDG INJURED THE PAX'S BACK.

Narrative: LNDG WAS FIRM. HAD DECLINED OFFER FOR NO ILS, VISUAL TAILWIND LNDG ON RWY 24 ON MCO-RSW LEG. DECLINED AND SHOT VISUAL TO RWY 06 WITH ILS BACKUP. STABILIZED APCH TO TOUCHDOWN. PICKED UP SINK RATE (APPARENTLY) DURING TRANSITION TO VISUAL. DUE TO 'BLACK HOLE' WITH NO PERIPHERAL CUES, DID NOT RECOGNIZE SINK RATE UNTIL NEAR TOUCHDOWN. LNDG WAS FIRM BUT NOT HARD. NO MASKS DROPPED. FEW PAX COMMENTED ABOUT LNDG BUT NOTHING UNUSUAL. 2 DAYS LATER, A PAX TELLS ACR HIS BACK WAS INJURED DURING LNDG. IN ADDITION TO LACK OF VISUAL CUES, WE WERE IN 13TH HR OF SCHEDULED 12 HR DUTY DAY AFTER SHORT LAYOVER. FATIGUE MAY HAVE ALSO BEEN A FACTOR. UPON REFLECTION, IT COULD HAVE BEEN A LATE FLARE DUE TO SOME VISUAL PROBS. I RECALL THAT LAST LOOK AT VSI INDICATED NORMAL RATE OF DSCNT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.