37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 301687 |
Time | |
Date | 199503 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : msp |
State Reference | MN |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 4000 flight time type : 1500 |
ASRS Report | 301687 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
During baggage loading we were given a bag count. After calculations, we discovered this baggage count would put the aircraft over the maximum zero fuel weight. After notifying the gate representative that we would have to remove 45 bags, he said they would take care of it. When the gate representative returned, he notified us of the new bag count and that the ground handlers miscounted the forward cargo bags, therefore, there was no need to remove any bags. When we picked up the same passenger in acapulco on mar/xa/95, they once again had too many bags. After double-checking with the gate representative, they assured us the bag count of 248 was correct. We then instructed the ground handlers to remove 55 bags so that we could remain within our maximum zero fuel weight of 141.0 pounds. After discussing this situation with other crewmembers, they informed us that similar sits have occurred with them. My concern is that the baggage count out of msp is being falsely skewed to maintain within limits, when indeed an aircraft may be 1500 pounds or more over maximum gross weight of maximum zero fuel ft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: RPTR ACFT WAS LOADED TO EXCEED MAX ZERO FUEL WT.
Narrative: DURING BAGGAGE LOADING WE WERE GIVEN A BAG COUNT. AFTER CALCULATIONS, WE DISCOVERED THIS BAGGAGE COUNT WOULD PUT THE ACFT OVER THE MAX ZERO FUEL WT. AFTER NOTIFYING THE GATE REPRESENTATIVE THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO REMOVE 45 BAGS, HE SAID THEY WOULD TAKE CARE OF IT. WHEN THE GATE REPRESENTATIVE RETURNED, HE NOTIFIED US OF THE NEW BAG COUNT AND THAT THE GND HANDLERS MISCOUNTED THE FORWARD CARGO BAGS, THEREFORE, THERE WAS NO NEED TO REMOVE ANY BAGS. WHEN WE PICKED UP THE SAME PAX IN ACAPULCO ON MAR/XA/95, THEY ONCE AGAIN HAD TOO MANY BAGS. AFTER DOUBLE-CHKING WITH THE GATE REPRESENTATIVE, THEY ASSURED US THE BAG COUNT OF 248 WAS CORRECT. WE THEN INSTRUCTED THE GND HANDLERS TO REMOVE 55 BAGS SO THAT WE COULD REMAIN WITHIN OUR MAX ZERO FUEL WT OF 141.0 LBS. AFTER DISCUSSING THIS SIT WITH OTHER CREWMEMBERS, THEY INFORMED US THAT SIMILAR SITS HAVE OCCURRED WITH THEM. MY CONCERN IS THAT THE BAGGAGE COUNT OUT OF MSP IS BEING FALSELY SKEWED TO MAINTAIN WITHIN LIMITS, WHEN INDEED AN ACFT MAY BE 1500 LBS OR MORE OVER MAX GROSS WT OF MAX ZERO FUEL FT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.