Narrative:

On the sayge 1 arrival to den approaching 'hoker' at 11000 ft (and which is about 4 mi northeast of the front range airport), we were in and out of numerous thunderstorms. Asked if we had field in sight, we replied in affirmative and accepted visual approach clearance to runway 35L at den. As we turned on a right base, we entered a small rain shower and lost visual contact with field. Shortly after reacquiring a runway, we realized it to be the front range airport and broke off the approach -- climbed to 8000 ft and requested radar vectors to runway 35L at den -- while an uneventful landing was made. Problem arose due to the late hour, long day, sense of familiarity, WX, fatigue. Accepted visual approach when radar vector to final would have been more prudent. Recognized problem by reference to localizer CDI, and GS indication and visual reference cues 'just didn't look right.'

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: APCH TO WRONG ARPT IN A NIGHT OP.

Narrative: ON THE SAYGE 1 ARR TO DEN APCHING 'HOKER' AT 11000 FT (AND WHICH IS ABOUT 4 MI NE OF THE FRONT RANGE ARPT), WE WERE IN AND OUT OF NUMEROUS TSTMS. ASKED IF WE HAD FIELD IN SIGHT, WE REPLIED IN AFFIRMATIVE AND ACCEPTED VISUAL APCH CLRNC TO RWY 35L AT DEN. AS WE TURNED ON A R BASE, WE ENTERED A SMALL RAIN SHOWER AND LOST VISUAL CONTACT WITH FIELD. SHORTLY AFTER REACQUIRING A RWY, WE REALIZED IT TO BE THE FRONT RANGE ARPT AND BROKE OFF THE APCH -- CLBED TO 8000 FT AND REQUESTED RADAR VECTORS TO RWY 35L AT DEN -- WHILE AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG WAS MADE. PROB AROSE DUE TO THE LATE HR, LONG DAY, SENSE OF FAMILIARITY, WX, FATIGUE. ACCEPTED VISUAL APCH WHEN RADAR VECTOR TO FINAL WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE PRUDENT. RECOGNIZED PROB BY REF TO LOC CDI, AND GS INDICATION AND VISUAL REF CUES 'JUST DIDN'T LOOK RIGHT.'

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.