37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 314690 |
Time | |
Date | 199509 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : oak |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 8500 msl bound upper : 9000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : oak |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other |
Route In Use | enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 210 flight time total : 15000 flight time type : 500 |
ASRS Report | 314690 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 170 flight time total : 7000 flight time type : 1100 |
ASRS Report | 314691 |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude non adherence : clearance non adherence other other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : became reoriented none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
While being radar vectored for an approach to oak the PF (captain) was handling ATC, while PNF (first officer) was doing a PA to the passenger. Some communication was confused or misunderstood and the assigned altitude was uncertain. 9000 ft was set on the altitude alerter, but the PF understood that 7000 ft was the last assigned altitude. We had descended to 8500 ft before a discussion between the PF and PNF regarding the last assigned altitude was. It was determined to request confirmation. No immediate response was received from ATC. We were finally given 8000 ft with no comments made. As a result, we do not know if any excursion or deviation was made. ATC was very busy and was giving speed, altitudes, heading, traffic and clrncs quite rapidly. I can understand and appreciate their workload, however too much information, too fast, is not a good combination as confusion and misinterpretation can be introduced. Overall, I feel that ATC does a commendable job under their circumstances. Supplemental information from acn 314691: I thought we were cleared to 7000 ft, slow to 180 KTS. I slowed the airplane, while leveling off at approximately 9000 ft. The first officer did not hear descend to 7000 ft, so the altitude alerter was set at 9000 ft. I then started to descend to 7000 ft and the alerter went off. I leveled off at 8500 ft and climbed back up to 9000 ft. I asked the first officer to verify we were cleared to 7000 ft. He asked approach what our clearance altitude was (twice). ATC then responded, 'air carrier X descend to 8000 ft, we have traffic behind you at 7000 ft.'
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ALT DEV ALT EXCURSION.
Narrative: WHILE BEING RADAR VECTORED FOR AN APCH TO OAK THE PF (CAPT) WAS HANDLING ATC, WHILE PNF (FO) WAS DOING A PA TO THE PAX. SOME COM WAS CONFUSED OR MISUNDERSTOOD AND THE ASSIGNED ALT WAS UNCERTAIN. 9000 FT WAS SET ON THE ALT ALERTER, BUT THE PF UNDERSTOOD THAT 7000 FT WAS THE LAST ASSIGNED ALT. WE HAD DSNDED TO 8500 FT BEFORE A DISCUSSION BTWN THE PF AND PNF REGARDING THE LAST ASSIGNED ALT WAS. IT WAS DETERMINED TO REQUEST CONFIRMATION. NO IMMEDIATE RESPONSE WAS RECEIVED FROM ATC. WE WERE FINALLY GIVEN 8000 FT WITH NO COMMENTS MADE. AS A RESULT, WE DO NOT KNOW IF ANY EXCURSION OR DEV WAS MADE. ATC WAS VERY BUSY AND WAS GIVING SPD, ALTS, HDG, TFC AND CLRNCS QUITE RAPIDLY. I CAN UNDERSTAND AND APPRECIATE THEIR WORKLOAD, HOWEVER TOO MUCH INFO, TOO FAST, IS NOT A GOOD COMBINATION AS CONFUSION AND MISINTERPRETATION CAN BE INTRODUCED. OVERALL, I FEEL THAT ATC DOES A COMMENDABLE JOB UNDER THEIR CIRCUMSTANCES. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 314691: I THOUGHT WE WERE CLRED TO 7000 FT, SLOW TO 180 KTS. I SLOWED THE AIRPLANE, WHILE LEVELING OFF AT APPROX 9000 FT. THE FO DID NOT HEAR DSND TO 7000 FT, SO THE ALT ALERTER WAS SET AT 9000 FT. I THEN STARTED TO DSND TO 7000 FT AND THE ALERTER WENT OFF. I LEVELED OFF AT 8500 FT AND CLBED BACK UP TO 9000 FT. I ASKED THE FO TO VERIFY WE WERE CLRED TO 7000 FT. HE ASKED APCH WHAT OUR CLRNC ALT WAS (TWICE). ATC THEN RESPONDED, 'ACR X DSND TO 8000 FT, WE HAVE TFC BEHIND YOU AT 7000 FT.'
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.