Narrative:

After the PIC/instructor had a current limiter charged we flew the aircraft without the required maintenance release/sign off. This was an oversight. I thought that he had taken care of all of the maintenance requirements. I should have questioned him. Supplemental information from acn 316778: the PIC/flight instructor had experienced a blown current limiter on his inbound flight. He had it changed prior to departure by a certified mechanic. Apparently the maintenance release or logbook sign off was not effected in the most propitious manner. I thought that's what they were doing. In my mind, our flight would also serve as a maintenance test hop to verify proper operation of the affected part. The maintenance facility made an issue of it while we were flying.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MAINT RELEASE NOT OBTAINED.

Narrative: AFTER THE PIC/INSTRUCTOR HAD A CURRENT LIMITER CHARGED WE FLEW THE ACFT WITHOUT THE REQUIRED MAINT RELEASE/SIGN OFF. THIS WAS AN OVERSIGHT. I THOUGHT THAT HE HAD TAKEN CARE OF ALL OF THE MAINT REQUIREMENTS. I SHOULD HAVE QUESTIONED HIM. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 316778: THE PIC/FLT INSTRUCTOR HAD EXPERIENCED A BLOWN CURRENT LIMITER ON HIS INBOUND FLT. HE HAD IT CHANGED PRIOR TO DEP BY A CERTIFIED MECH. APPARENTLY THE MAINT RELEASE OR LOGBOOK SIGN OFF WAS NOT EFFECTED IN THE MOST PROPITIOUS MANNER. I THOUGHT THAT'S WHAT THEY WERE DOING. IN MY MIND, OUR FLT WOULD ALSO SERVE AS A MAINT TEST HOP TO VERIFY PROPER OP OF THE AFFECTED PART. THE MAINT FACILITY MADE AN ISSUE OF IT WHILE WE WERE FLYING.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.