Near midair collision. One aircraft on landing rollout, other go around. Non tower airport.

Attributes
ACN	317279
Time
Date	199509
Day	Sat
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : lna
State Reference	FL
Altitude	agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	general aviation : personal
Make Model Name	Experimental
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	landing other
Flight Plan	None
Aircraft 2
Operator	general aviation : personal
Make Model Name	Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	descent : approach landing other
Flight Plan	None
Person 1
Affiliation	Other
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : private
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 30 flight time total : 5300 flight time type : 75
ASRS Report	317279
Person 2
Affiliation	Other
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Qualification	pilot : private
Events
Anomaly	conflict : nmac non adherence : far other anomaly other other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	flight crew : took evasive action none taken : insufficient time other
Consequence	Other
Miss Distance	horizontal : 15 vertical : 15
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

I landed my aircraft and another pilot took evasive action. He used no radio, flew no pattern and I was dead right. Please print this to emphasize the see and be seen issue. I never saw him. Probably if I looked again for a straight in approach, I may have seen him. During my approach I saw a 172 flying north over the intercoastal waterway. He was not in the pattern and was too far north to enter a standard pattern. The tetrahedron was facing the west. Additionally, I monitored and used the unicom. The unicom frequency was not manned at the time that I landed and after the incident mr X told me that his radios were not working. That is why he came back to the airport. I never heard him on the radio. My first standard VFR approach to lantana was a balked landing as I did not like the approach speed and decided to go around. Mr X stated to me that he had seen me 'takeoff.' during all of this I announced my position and intentions over the unicom, flew a standard pattern and scanned the pattern for other aircraft and I never saw or heard any aircraft in the pattern to lantana. Since my aircraft approach speed is in excess of 100 mph, I require more runway than a cessna 150 or 172. The visibility of my cassutt IIIM is similar to a pitts on the rollout, but visibility in the flying mode is excellent. I was at the end of my rollout when the 172 went past me, and my suspicions are he never flew a standard VFR pattern and he landed after I was on the runway.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NMAC. ONE ACFT ON LNDG ROLLOUT, OTHER GAR. NON TWR ARPT.

Narrative: I LANDED MY ACFT AND ANOTHER PLT TOOK EVASIVE ACTION. HE USED NO RADIO, FLEW NO PATTERN AND I WAS DEAD RIGHT. PLEASE PRINT THIS TO EMPHASIZE THE SEE AND BE SEEN ISSUE. I NEVER SAW HIM. PROBABLY IF I LOOKED AGAIN FOR A STRAIGHT IN APCH, I MAY HAVE SEEN HIM. DURING MY APCH I SAW A 172 FLYING N OVER THE INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY. HE WAS NOT IN THE PATTERN AND WAS TOO FAR N TO ENTER A STANDARD PATTERN. THE TETRAHEDRON WAS FACING THE W. ADDITIONALLY, I MONITORED AND USED THE UNICOM. THE UNICOM FREQ WAS NOT MANNED AT THE TIME THAT I LANDED AND AFTER THE INCIDENT MR X TOLD ME THAT HIS RADIOS WERE NOT WORKING. THAT IS WHY HE CAME BACK TO THE ARPT. I NEVER HEARD HIM ON THE RADIO. MY FIRST STANDARD VFR APCH TO LANTANA WAS A BALKED LNDG AS I DID NOT LIKE THE APCH SPD AND DECIDED TO GAR. MR X STATED TO ME THAT HE HAD SEEN ME 'TKOF.' DURING ALL OF THIS I ANNOUNCED MY POS AND INTENTIONS OVER THE UNICOM, FLEW A STANDARD PATTERN AND SCANNED THE PATTERN FOR OTHER ACFT AND I NEVER SAW OR HEARD ANY ACFT IN THE PATTERN TO LANTANA. SINCE MY ACFT APCH SPD IS IN EXCESS OF 100 MPH, I REQUIRE MORE RWY THAN A CESSNA 150 OR 172. THE VISIBILITY OF MY CASSUTT IIIM IS SIMILAR TO A PITTS ON THE ROLLOUT, BUT VISIBILITY IN THE FLYING MODE IS EXCELLENT. I WAS AT THE END OF MY ROLLOUT WHEN THE 172 WENT PAST ME, AND MY SUSPICIONS ARE HE NEVER FLEW A STANDARD VFR PATTERN AND HE LANDED AFTER I WAS ON THE RWY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.