37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 324380 |
Time | |
Date | 199512 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : otz |
State Reference | AK |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 2500 msl bound upper : 2500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | other other : other pilot : instrument pilot : cfi pilot : atp pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 275 flight time total : 2800 flight time type : 550 |
ASRS Report | 324380 |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
It is the policy at the airline for which I fly, to check a document in the flight 'can' to be sure that all inspections, airworthiness directives, etc, are current prior to flight. On dec/xx/95 I inadvertently overflew 2 airworthiness directives. Both were due at the same time. I believe that this situation occurred because: I overlooked the times on the airworthiness directives, and the mechanics overlooked the times on the airworthiness directives. I do recognize that it is ultimately the PIC's responsibility to make sure the aircraft is airworthy. A contributing factor may have been that I was possibly in a hurry, which caused the oversight. The obvious remedy for the situation is to slow down, and check things out thoroughly. I discovered the problem around dec/xx/95, by simply going through the paperwork to be sure all inspections were competed prior to flight.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PLT OF AN SMA SEL EXCEEDED THE FLT TIME LIMITATIONS FOR 2 AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES.
Narrative: IT IS THE POLICY AT THE AIRLINE FOR WHICH I FLY, TO CHK A DOCUMENT IN THE FLT 'CAN' TO BE SURE THAT ALL INSPECTIONS, AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES, ETC, ARE CURRENT PRIOR TO FLT. ON DEC/XX/95 I INADVERTENTLY OVERFLEW 2 AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES. BOTH WERE DUE AT THE SAME TIME. I BELIEVE THAT THIS SIT OCCURRED BECAUSE: I OVERLOOKED THE TIMES ON THE AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES, AND THE MECHS OVERLOOKED THE TIMES ON THE AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES. I DO RECOGNIZE THAT IT IS ULTIMATELY THE PIC'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE SURE THE ACFT IS AIRWORTHY. A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR MAY HAVE BEEN THAT I WAS POSSIBLY IN A HURRY, WHICH CAUSED THE OVERSIGHT. THE OBVIOUS REMEDY FOR THE SIT IS TO SLOW DOWN, AND CHK THINGS OUT THOROUGHLY. I DISCOVERED THE PROB AROUND DEC/XX/95, BY SIMPLY GOING THROUGH THE PAPERWORK TO BE SURE ALL INSPECTIONS WERE COMPETED PRIOR TO FLT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.