37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 330660 |
Time | |
Date | 199603 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mli |
State Reference | IL |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 600 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : mli |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude climbout : initial |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 20 flight time total : 980 flight time type : 15 |
ASRS Report | 330660 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Qualification | controller : non radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter other non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Cleared for takeoff runway 5 to maintain runway heading. Flock of waterfowl noticed at 11 O'clock position moving left to right at about 500 ft AGL after takeoff. Turned 40 degrees left to avoid hazard. Handed off to approach at about 600-700 ft AGL and approach controller came unglued when she learned I was 010 degrees and returning to 050 degrees. She instead asked for 260 degree heading due to incoming traffic from the north. Not having time to explain the reason for the heading change, and due to frequency congestion, I just kept the explanation to myself. I don't know if this scenario could have been prevented since the cause was birds flying around an airport, and on a waterway.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PLT OF AN SMT TURNED TO AVOID A FLOCK OF BIRDS AFTER TKOF. THE DEV FROM THE ASSIGNED HDG WAS NOT CONVEYED TO ATC UNTIL AFTER THE HDOF TO DEP CTLR.
Narrative: CLRED FOR TKOF RWY 5 TO MAINTAIN RWY HDG. FLOCK OF WATERFOWL NOTICED AT 11 O'CLOCK POS MOVING L TO R AT ABOUT 500 FT AGL AFTER TKOF. TURNED 40 DEGS L TO AVOID HAZARD. HANDED OFF TO APCH AT ABOUT 600-700 FT AGL AND APCH CTLR CAME UNGLUED WHEN SHE LEARNED I WAS 010 DEGS AND RETURNING TO 050 DEGS. SHE INSTEAD ASKED FOR 260 DEG HDG DUE TO INCOMING TFC FROM THE N. NOT HAVING TIME TO EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR THE HDG CHANGE, AND DUE TO FREQ CONGESTION, I JUST KEPT THE EXPLANATION TO MYSELF. I DON'T KNOW IF THIS SCENARIO COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED SINCE THE CAUSE WAS BIRDS FLYING AROUND AN ARPT, AND ON A WATERWAY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.