37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 331714 |
Time | |
Date | 199603 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : stl |
State Reference | MO |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 25 flight time total : 3500 |
ASRS Report | 331714 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : ground |
Qualification | controller : non radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I had filed IFR from lambert, st louis to rochester, mn. I was parked just north of runway 13/31 on lambert field, received my clearance while on the ramp, and was told to contact ground control. I contacted ground control, they had me hold momentarily, then cleared me to back taxi on runway 31, and remain on their frequency. I arrived at the beginning of runway 31, turned 180 degrees and faced down the runway. Ground control immediately called me and asked if I was 'ready to go.' I replied in the negative, and said I had to complete my run-up first. I was instructed to remain on the ground control frequency and inform ground control when I was 'ready to go.' I was just completing my run-up -- it couldn't have been more than a min -- when I was again called and asked if I was 'ready to go yet.' I detected a sense of urgency in his voice -- he really wanted to get me out of there. I replied that I was, and he said 'ok, monitor tower.' given my impression of his sense of urgency, I interpreted this to mean that I was cleared for takeoff, and was to monitor the tower for further instructions after takeoff. So I took off. I was surprised when the tower called me as I was retracting the gear, informing me that I had not been cleared for takeoff. I apologized, and there was no further conversation about it. I completed the IFR flight uneventfully, landing in rochester some 2 hours and 12 mins later. Obviously, what they meant by 'monitor the tower' was 'don't call us, we'll call you and clear you for takeoff when we're ready.' I hadn't flown into lambert for yrs and was a stranger to the particular procedures there. Also, even though I had assumed a position for takeoff which was identical to that resulting from a 'taxi into position and hold' I had never been issued any hold instruction. Nor did ground say to monitor the tower for takeoff clearance, or anything like that. There was never any reference to either holding or to further clearance. In these circumstances any reference to either of those commonly understood instructions would have alerted me to the fact that I was not cleared for takeoff and avoided this misunderstanding.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PLT OF AN SMA TOOK OFF WITHOUT CLRNC DUE TO A MISUNDERSTANDING OF TWR INSTRUCTIONS.
Narrative: I HAD FILED IFR FROM LAMBERT, ST LOUIS TO ROCHESTER, MN. I WAS PARKED JUST N OF RWY 13/31 ON LAMBERT FIELD, RECEIVED MY CLRNC WHILE ON THE RAMP, AND WAS TOLD TO CONTACT GND CTL. I CONTACTED GND CTL, THEY HAD ME HOLD MOMENTARILY, THEN CLRED ME TO BACK TAXI ON RWY 31, AND REMAIN ON THEIR FREQ. I ARRIVED AT THE BEGINNING OF RWY 31, TURNED 180 DEGS AND FACED DOWN THE RWY. GND CTL IMMEDIATELY CALLED ME AND ASKED IF I WAS 'READY TO GO.' I REPLIED IN THE NEGATIVE, AND SAID I HAD TO COMPLETE MY RUN-UP FIRST. I WAS INSTRUCTED TO REMAIN ON THE GND CTL FREQ AND INFORM GND CTL WHEN I WAS 'READY TO GO.' I WAS JUST COMPLETING MY RUN-UP -- IT COULDN'T HAVE BEEN MORE THAN A MIN -- WHEN I WAS AGAIN CALLED AND ASKED IF I WAS 'READY TO GO YET.' I DETECTED A SENSE OF URGENCY IN HIS VOICE -- HE REALLY WANTED TO GET ME OUT OF THERE. I REPLIED THAT I WAS, AND HE SAID 'OK, MONITOR TWR.' GIVEN MY IMPRESSION OF HIS SENSE OF URGENCY, I INTERPRETED THIS TO MEAN THAT I WAS CLRED FOR TKOF, AND WAS TO MONITOR THE TWR FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS AFTER TKOF. SO I TOOK OFF. I WAS SURPRISED WHEN THE TWR CALLED ME AS I WAS RETRACTING THE GEAR, INFORMING ME THAT I HAD NOT BEEN CLRED FOR TKOF. I APOLOGIZED, AND THERE WAS NO FURTHER CONVERSATION ABOUT IT. I COMPLETED THE IFR FLT UNEVENTFULLY, LNDG IN ROCHESTER SOME 2 HRS AND 12 MINS LATER. OBVIOUSLY, WHAT THEY MEANT BY 'MONITOR THE TWR' WAS 'DON'T CALL US, WE'LL CALL YOU AND CLR YOU FOR TKOF WHEN WE'RE READY.' I HADN'T FLOWN INTO LAMBERT FOR YRS AND WAS A STRANGER TO THE PARTICULAR PROCS THERE. ALSO, EVEN THOUGH I HAD ASSUMED A POS FOR TKOF WHICH WAS IDENTICAL TO THAT RESULTING FROM A 'TAXI INTO POS AND HOLD' I HAD NEVER BEEN ISSUED ANY HOLD INSTRUCTION. NOR DID GND SAY TO MONITOR THE TWR FOR TKOF CLRNC, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. THERE WAS NEVER ANY REF TO EITHER HOLDING OR TO FURTHER CLRNC. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES ANY REF TO EITHER OF THOSE COMMONLY UNDERSTOOD INSTRUCTIONS WOULD HAVE ALERTED ME TO THE FACT THAT I WAS NOT CLRED FOR TKOF AND AVOIDED THIS MISUNDERSTANDING.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.