Narrative:

I believe that I may have unintentionally endorsed a student pilot in private pilot training for a solo cross country flight and sent him off to fly in an aircraft that was past due for a 100 hour inspection. The aircraft may also have been past due for airworthiness directives as well. This happened due to my failure to check all aircraft maintenance schedules and to check the aircraft status sheet for currency. I may also have wrongly depended upon a student to verify that the aircraft was worthy to fly. This was wrong, and in the future I intend to check all aircraft maintenance schedules and be aware at all times the status of the training aircraft in regards to 100 hour inspections, airworthiness directives, annual and oil change times.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: 2 CFI'S OPERATED A C172 THAT HAD FLOWN PAST ITS 100 HR INSPECTION INTERVAL. ONE CFI SENT A SPI ON A SOLO XCOUNTRY, THE OTHER FLEW NIGHT TOUCH-AND-GOES.

Narrative: I BELIEVE THAT I MAY HAVE UNINTENTIONALLY ENDORSED A STUDENT PLT IN PVT PLT TRAINING FOR A SOLO XCOUNTRY FLT AND SENT HIM OFF TO FLY IN AN ACFT THAT WAS PAST DUE FOR A 100 HR INSPECTION. THE ACFT MAY ALSO HAVE BEEN PAST DUE FOR AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES AS WELL. THIS HAPPENED DUE TO MY FAILURE TO CHK ALL ACFT MAINT SCHEDULES AND TO CHK THE ACFT STATUS SHEET FOR CURRENCY. I MAY ALSO HAVE WRONGLY DEPENDED UPON A STUDENT TO VERIFY THAT THE ACFT WAS WORTHY TO FLY. THIS WAS WRONG, AND IN THE FUTURE I INTEND TO CHK ALL ACFT MAINT SCHEDULES AND BE AWARE AT ALL TIMES THE STATUS OF THE TRAINING ACFT IN REGARDS TO 100 HR INSPECTIONS, AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES, ANNUAL AND OIL CHANGE TIMES.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.