Narrative:

After holding at mccomb while waiting for a thunderstorm to pass new orleans, the decision was made to proceed to the alternate for fuel. From a position about 20 NM northeast at mcb at FL250, a clearance was issued to turn to a heading of 280 degrees and proceed to btr. Some time later the controller asked what our heading was, and we replied 210 degrees. He advised us we were assigned a 280 degree heading, but we were now clear of traffic, proceed to btr. We understood the original clearance to be 'head 280 degrees, when able, direct btr.' from the cockpit, no conflicts were noted either visually or on TCASII.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN ACR B737 CREW MAY HAVE MISUNDERSTOOD ITS HDG CLRNC. THEY FLEW DIRECT TO BTR WHEN THEY WERE EXPECTED TO FLY 280 DEGS. POSSIBLE ERROR ADMITTED.

Narrative: AFTER HOLDING AT MCCOMB WHILE WAITING FOR A TSTM TO PASS NEW ORLEANS, THE DECISION WAS MADE TO PROCEED TO THE ALTERNATE FOR FUEL. FROM A POS ABOUT 20 NM NE AT MCB AT FL250, A CLRNC WAS ISSUED TO TURN TO A HDG OF 280 DEGS AND PROCEED TO BTR. SOME TIME LATER THE CTLR ASKED WHAT OUR HEADING WAS, AND WE REPLIED 210 DEGS. HE ADVISED US WE WERE ASSIGNED A 280 DEG HDG, BUT WE WERE NOW CLR OF TFC, PROCEED TO BTR. WE UNDERSTOOD THE ORIGINAL CLRNC TO BE 'HEAD 280 DEGS, WHEN ABLE, DIRECT BTR.' FROM THE COCKPIT, NO CONFLICTS WERE NOTED EITHER VISUALLY OR ON TCASII.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.