37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 341896 |
Time | |
Date | 199607 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : stl airport : lit |
State Reference | MO |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zkc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Super 80 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other other other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
ASRS Report | 341896 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : declared emergency none taken : unable other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
Approximately 100 mi northwest of stl, we were informed that the smell of smoke was in the cabin area. All flight attendants noticed it as well as all passenger. They said that it had a little smell of sulfur. I went back to assess the situation. I noticed the smell as soon as the cockpit door was opened. I did not notice the smell of sulfur but of just smoke. There was a little haze in the cabin. I had the flight attendant feel the floor as well as all overhead bins for warm spots. The smoke dissipated in approximately 5 mins with no visible smoke. We assumed that a passenger must have lit a cigarette and I made a PA requesting whoever did that admit to a flight attendant with no repercussions. In approximately 15 mins after that, the smoke and smell returned for approximately 5 mins. All electrical loads were normal and we did have airfoil anti-ice on at that time. We tried to isolate the problem with the airfoil anti-ice system. We were also informed that it appeared that every time the seat belt sign was cycled that the smoke reappeared. The smoke dissipated in 5 mins. I was still not convinced that it was a fire, either electrical or otherwise, because it kept dissipating. The only thing we did not alter were the air-conditioning supply switches. After about 15 more mins, the smell reappeared again, so we decided to declare an emergency and divert to lit. During the approach, the flight attendants noticed it again and also on the ground several times. Crash fire rescue equipment trucks were requested and we went through the emergency landing procedure minus having the flight attendants going through their procedures. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter does not know what caused the odor, mostly of sulfur. It did not smell like an electrical problem. Both air-conditioning packs were working with normal temperature indications. The reporter regrets that he did not turn off the high pressure bleeds.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN ACR MD80 CREW CHOSE TO DIVER LAND WITH A SULFUR SMELLING SMOKE HAZE IN THE CABIN. EMER DECLARED. EMER CRASH ALERT ACTIVATED.
Narrative: APPROX 100 MI NW OF STL, WE WERE INFORMED THAT THE SMELL OF SMOKE WAS IN THE CABIN AREA. ALL FLT ATTENDANTS NOTICED IT AS WELL AS ALL PAX. THEY SAID THAT IT HAD A LITTLE SMELL OF SULFUR. I WENT BACK TO ASSESS THE SIT. I NOTICED THE SMELL AS SOON AS THE COCKPIT DOOR WAS OPENED. I DID NOT NOTICE THE SMELL OF SULFUR BUT OF JUST SMOKE. THERE WAS A LITTLE HAZE IN THE CABIN. I HAD THE FLT ATTENDANT FEEL THE FLOOR AS WELL AS ALL OVERHEAD BINS FOR WARM SPOTS. THE SMOKE DISSIPATED IN APPROX 5 MINS WITH NO VISIBLE SMOKE. WE ASSUMED THAT A PAX MUST HAVE LIT A CIGARETTE AND I MADE A PA REQUESTING WHOEVER DID THAT ADMIT TO A FLT ATTENDANT WITH NO REPERCUSSIONS. IN APPROX 15 MINS AFTER THAT, THE SMOKE AND SMELL RETURNED FOR APPROX 5 MINS. ALL ELECTRICAL LOADS WERE NORMAL AND WE DID HAVE AIRFOIL ANTI-ICE ON AT THAT TIME. WE TRIED TO ISOLATE THE PROB WITH THE AIRFOIL ANTI-ICE SYS. WE WERE ALSO INFORMED THAT IT APPEARED THAT EVERY TIME THE SEAT BELT SIGN WAS CYCLED THAT THE SMOKE REAPPEARED. THE SMOKE DISSIPATED IN 5 MINS. I WAS STILL NOT CONVINCED THAT IT WAS A FIRE, EITHER ELECTRICAL OR OTHERWISE, BECAUSE IT KEPT DISSIPATING. THE ONLY THING WE DID NOT ALTER WERE THE AIR-CONDITIONING SUPPLY SWITCHES. AFTER ABOUT 15 MORE MINS, THE SMELL REAPPEARED AGAIN, SO WE DECIDED TO DECLARE AN EMER AND DIVERT TO LIT. DURING THE APCH, THE FLT ATTENDANTS NOTICED IT AGAIN AND ALSO ON THE GND SEVERAL TIMES. CFR TRUCKS WERE REQUESTED AND WE WENT THROUGH THE EMER LNDG PROC MINUS HAVING THE FLT ATTENDANTS GOING THROUGH THEIR PROCS. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR DOES NOT KNOW WHAT CAUSED THE ODOR, MOSTLY OF SULFUR. IT DID NOT SMELL LIKE AN ELECTRICAL PROB. BOTH AIR-CONDITIONING PACKS WERE WORKING WITH NORMAL TEMP INDICATIONS. THE RPTR REGRETS THAT HE DID NOT TURN OFF THE HIGH PRESSURE BLEEDS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.