37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 345411 |
Time | |
Date | 199608 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lax |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 7700 msl bound upper : 8000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : lax |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | arrival star : star |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 230 flight time total : 30000 flight time type : 5000 |
ASRS Report | 345411 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : crossing restriction not met non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact none taken : insufficient time |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | procedure or policy : unspecified |
Narrative:
Approaching fuelr intersection, cleared for approach runway 25L at lax, controller advised of traffic at 10 O'clock. While looking descended slightly below 8000 ft crossing restr altitude at fuelr intersection. No traffic conflict and VFR, just prior we had a TCASII warning on previous traffic, so we were concerned with visually looking for traffic at the time, also first officer was manually flying the aircraft. I should have been watching the first officer more closely, even though we were VFR. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter sent in report because the approach controller was critical of their altitude crossing over fueler. Reporter felt unprofessional at not watching the PF more closely. Reporter feels that if the controller had cleared them for the approach but comply with all crossing altitudes, it would have 'raised a red flag, which would prevent an altitude deviation.'
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACFT CROSSES FUELR INTXN 300 FT LOW DURING LAX ILS APCH.
Narrative: APCHING FUELR INTXN, CLRED FOR APCH RWY 25L AT LAX, CTLR ADVISED OF TFC AT 10 O'CLOCK. WHILE LOOKING DSNDED SLIGHTLY BELOW 8000 FT XING RESTR ALT AT FUELR INTXN. NO TFC CONFLICT AND VFR, JUST PRIOR WE HAD A TCASII WARNING ON PREVIOUS TFC, SO WE WERE CONCERNED WITH VISUALLY LOOKING FOR TFC AT THE TIME, ALSO FO WAS MANUALLY FLYING THE ACFT. I SHOULD HAVE BEEN WATCHING THE FO MORE CLOSELY, EVEN THOUGH WE WERE VFR. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR SENT IN RPT BECAUSE THE APCH CTLR WAS CRITICAL OF THEIR ALT XING OVER FUELER. RPTR FELT UNPROFESSIONAL AT NOT WATCHING THE PF MORE CLOSELY. RPTR FEELS THAT IF THE CTLR HAD CLRED THEM FOR THE APCH BUT COMPLY WITH ALL XING ALTS, IT WOULD HAVE 'RAISED A RED FLAG, WHICH WOULD PREVENT AN ALTDEV.'
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.