Narrative:

Air carrier X (DC10) runway 24L departure, air carrier Y (L1011) runway 25R departure. Air carrier Y should have turned left to 220 degrees but did not. Lax tower called me to obtain visual separation between these aircraft. I immediately told the other departure radar position to turn air carrier Y, which they told me they had already done. I idented air carrier X, but did not attempt visual separation since course divergence was already in effect. Lax tower is responsible to ensure initial departure separation. The fact that air carrier Y did not turn and the tower was no longer communicating with either aircraft made it impossible for them to do their job - - yet another example of lax tower failing to separate aircraft.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN ACR L1011 OFF RWY 25R AT LAX AT THE SAME TIME AN ACR DC10 TKOF FROM RWY 24L AND THE L1011 FAILED TO MAKE THE TURN AS PUBLISHED ON THE SID. ATCT LCL CTLR SAW THIS, BUT HAD ALREADY GIVEN THE ACFT A FREQ CHANGE TO DEP CTL. COORD BTWN TWR AND DEP CTL WAS NOT TIMELY ENOUGH TO PREVENT A LOSS OF SEPARATION.

Narrative: ACR X (DC10) RWY 24L DEP, ACR Y (L1011) RWY 25R DEP. ACR Y SHOULD HAVE TURNED L TO 220 DEGS BUT DID NOT. LAX TWR CALLED ME TO OBTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION BTWN THESE ACFT. I IMMEDIATELY TOLD THE OTHER DEP RADAR POS TO TURN ACR Y, WHICH THEY TOLD ME THEY HAD ALREADY DONE. I IDENTED ACR X, BUT DID NOT ATTEMPT VISUAL SEPARATION SINCE COURSE DIVERGENCE WAS ALREADY IN EFFECT. LAX TWR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE INITIAL DEP SEPARATION. THE FACT THAT ACR Y DID NOT TURN AND THE TWR WAS NO LONGER COMMUNICATING WITH EITHER ACFT MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO DO THEIR JOB - - YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF LAX TWR FAILING TO SEPARATE ACFT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.