37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 350334 |
Time | |
Date | 199610 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sfo |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 4000 msl bound upper : 4500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : oak |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-400 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 11000 flight time type : 1000 |
ASRS Report | 350334 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 14000 flight time type : 1300 |
ASRS Report | 350337 |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
Descending into sfo, cleared for the tipp toe visual runway 28L, we were inbound to menlo intersection on oak 151 degree radial, had selected 4000 ft in altitude alerter. Bay approach issued a heading of 020 degrees. This heading pointed us directly at an air carrier Y B737 (cleared for a visual to runway 28R). We were descending through 4500 ft when we got a TCASII RA to 'descend,' caused by our proximity to the air carrier Y B737. Approach then cleared us for the visual to runway 28L. At this time, we were approximately 1/2 mi north of the runway 28R localizer and had to maneuver through both runway 28 locs to return to the visual course for runway 28L. When queried about the heading, the approach controller stated 'for separation to the runway.' we feel the heading given created a greater danger than either restricting our descent or slowing us down.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: APCH CTLR VECTORED AN ACR B737 OFF THE TIPP TOE VISUAL TO RWY 28L AT SFO FOR SPACING WITH ANOTHER ACFT B737 ON A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 28R. CAPT OF FIRST B737 RECEIVED A TCASII ON THE OTHER ACFT AND FOLLOWED IT, THEN QUESTIONED THE CTLR ON THE VECTOR, AND FELT HE COULD HAVE DONE A BETTER JOB OF SPACING HIS ACFT.
Narrative: DSNDING INTO SFO, CLRED FOR THE TIPP TOE VISUAL RWY 28L, WE WERE INBOUND TO MENLO INTXN ON OAK 151 DEG RADIAL, HAD SELECTED 4000 FT IN ALT ALERTER. BAY APCH ISSUED A HDG OF 020 DEGS. THIS HDG POINTED US DIRECTLY AT AN ACR Y B737 (CLRED FOR A VISUAL TO RWY 28R). WE WERE DSNDING THROUGH 4500 FT WHEN WE GOT A TCASII RA TO 'DSND,' CAUSED BY OUR PROX TO THE ACR Y B737. APCH THEN CLRED US FOR THE VISUAL TO RWY 28L. AT THIS TIME, WE WERE APPROX 1/2 MI N OF THE RWY 28R LOC AND HAD TO MANEUVER THROUGH BOTH RWY 28 LOCS TO RETURN TO THE VISUAL COURSE FOR RWY 28L. WHEN QUERIED ABOUT THE HDG, THE APCH CTLR STATED 'FOR SEPARATION TO THE RWY.' WE FEEL THE HDG GIVEN CREATED A GREATER DANGER THAN EITHER RESTRICTING OUR DSCNT OR SLOWING US DOWN.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.