37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 353649 |
Time | |
Date | 199611 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : clt |
State Reference | NC |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Balloon |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff landing other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 11 flight time total : 375 flight time type : 325 |
ASRS Report | 353649 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
I was executing touch and goes in a lta-hab when confronted by aviation safety inspector upon landing, regarding altitude maintained. Takeoff with another lta-hab, one conducting commercial operations and drift over residential area adjacent to golf courses. Attempting to find suitable landing areas, I maintained an altitude of approximately 500 ft AGL. I landed twice, the first landing was next to a lake and my climb was not steeply sloped. The wind was calm, forecasted to be 4 mph. I made contact with a tree climbing out, gently brushing its top. Flew on after a touch and go, and landed shortly after that for my final resting place, on a not yet open road side. The issues raised when confronted by FSDO employee were: was I conducting a commercial operation? Which was confirmed by my passenger as not to be the case. Was I having an in-flight problem dictating my low altitude. I explained that I was attempting to land, which I did so twice, once shooting a touch and go. I never entered into the charlotte controled airspace, therefore radio contact with the tower was not made. I was maintaining an altitude below the class B airspace. At no time was flight safety in jeopardy, the flight was very uneventful, except upon landing having a FSDO employee ask for my pilot's license. No problems at all, the majority of the flight was over 2 golf courses and one school ball field.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A HOT AIR BALLOON PLT WAS QUESTIONED BY A FSDO SAFETY INSPECTOR REGARDING HIS PERCEIVED LOW FLT. FSDO SAFETY INSPECTOR PERCEPTION.
Narrative: I WAS EXECUTING TOUCH AND GOES IN A LTA-HAB WHEN CONFRONTED BY AVIATION SAFETY INSPECTOR UPON LNDG, REGARDING ALT MAINTAINED. TKOF WITH ANOTHER LTA-HAB, ONE CONDUCTING COMMERCIAL OPS AND DRIFT OVER RESIDENTIAL AREA ADJACENT TO GOLF COURSES. ATTEMPTING TO FIND SUITABLE LNDG AREAS, I MAINTAINED AN ALT OF APPROX 500 FT AGL. I LANDED TWICE, THE FIRST LNDG WAS NEXT TO A LAKE AND MY CLB WAS NOT STEEPLY SLOPED. THE WIND WAS CALM, FORECASTED TO BE 4 MPH. I MADE CONTACT WITH A TREE CLBING OUT, GENTLY BRUSHING ITS TOP. FLEW ON AFTER A TOUCH AND GO, AND LANDED SHORTLY AFTER THAT FOR MY FINAL RESTING PLACE, ON A NOT YET OPEN ROAD SIDE. THE ISSUES RAISED WHEN CONFRONTED BY FSDO EMPLOYEE WERE: WAS I CONDUCTING A COMMERCIAL OP? WHICH WAS CONFIRMED BY MY PAX AS NOT TO BE THE CASE. WAS I HAVING AN INFLT PROB DICTATING MY LOW ALT. I EXPLAINED THAT I WAS ATTEMPTING TO LAND, WHICH I DID SO TWICE, ONCE SHOOTING A TOUCH AND GO. I NEVER ENTERED INTO THE CHARLOTTE CTLED AIRSPACE, THEREFORE RADIO CONTACT WITH THE TWR WAS NOT MADE. I WAS MAINTAINING AN ALT BELOW THE CLASS B AIRSPACE. AT NO TIME WAS FLT SAFETY IN JEOPARDY, THE FLT WAS VERY UNEVENTFUL, EXCEPT UPON LNDG HAVING A FSDO EMPLOYEE ASK FOR MY PLT'S LICENSE. NO PROBS AT ALL, THE MAJORITY OF THE FLT WAS OVER 2 GOLF COURSES AND ONE SCHOOL BALL FIELD.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.