Narrative:

We were cleared RNAV direct craig VOR. Waypoint #2 was crg VOR, #3 was crg 55 (waypoint 55 mi north of craig). In error, #3 was selected. Rather than passing over crg VOR, we passed about 9 mi east of it. ATC gave us a 10 degree turn left to rejoin the airway. The cause of this was a breakdown in cockpit discipline. I assumed that the PNF was monitoring the vors (in accordance with air carrier policy) as the PF's instruments are monitoring the RNAV. In the future, I guess all crew members must be reminded of their duties rather than assuming that they will do them.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN ACR LGT HAD A HDG TRACK DEV.

Narrative: WE WERE CLRED RNAV DIRECT CRAIG VOR. WAYPOINT #2 WAS CRG VOR, #3 WAS CRG 55 (WAYPOINT 55 MI N OF CRAIG). IN ERROR, #3 WAS SELECTED. RATHER THAN PASSING OVER CRG VOR, WE PASSED ABOUT 9 MI E OF IT. ATC GAVE US A 10 DEG TURN L TO REJOIN THE AIRWAY. THE CAUSE OF THIS WAS A BREAKDOWN IN COCKPIT DISCIPLINE. I ASSUMED THAT THE PNF WAS MONITORING THE VORS (IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACR POLICY) AS THE PF'S INSTS ARE MONITORING THE RNAV. IN THE FUTURE, I GUESS ALL CREW MEMBERS MUST BE REMINDED OF THEIR DUTIES RATHER THAN ASSUMING THAT THEY WILL DO THEM.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.