37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 363378 |
Time | |
Date | 199703 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : orf |
State Reference | VA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 300 msl bound upper : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : orf |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Dash 8-100 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial other other |
Route In Use | departure other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 230 flight time total : 14000 flight time type : 5000 |
ASRS Report | 363378 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other other : unspecified cockpit |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : declared emergency other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
Departed runway 7 phf. At approximately 300 ft the #1 engine had a power loss of approximately 60%. The first officer was the PF. My initial thoughts were that we had an electric fuel control failure (however, the respective caution lights did not illuminate). The procedure for an ecu failure is to simply push that particular power lever forward to restore power. I did this, but did not regain takeoff power. We decided to handle this as an engine failure and secured #1 engine and declared an emergency to orf approach control. With the aircraft empty and cold night air the performance single-engine was excellent. We decided to land at orf instead of turning back to phf because phf tower had just closed, the crash fire rescue equipment facilities were not as readily available, orf was in sight, straight ahead. By the time we had finished with checklists and fully secured the #1 engine the distance to orf was about the same (10 mi).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A DHC8-100 DECLARED AN EMER AND DIVERTED TO ORF DUE TO #1 ENG FAILURE.
Narrative: DEPARTED RWY 7 PHF. AT APPROX 300 FT THE #1 ENG HAD A PWR LOSS OF APPROX 60%. THE FO WAS THE PF. MY INITIAL THOUGHTS WERE THAT WE HAD AN ELECTRIC FUEL CTL FAILURE (HOWEVER, THE RESPECTIVE CAUTION LIGHTS DID NOT ILLUMINATE). THE PROC FOR AN ECU FAILURE IS TO SIMPLY PUSH THAT PARTICULAR PWR LEVER FORWARD TO RESTORE PWR. I DID THIS, BUT DID NOT REGAIN TKOF PWR. WE DECIDED TO HANDLE THIS AS AN ENG FAILURE AND SECURED #1 ENG AND DECLARED AN EMER TO ORF APCH CTL. WITH THE ACFT EMPTY AND COLD NIGHT AIR THE PERFORMANCE SINGLE-ENG WAS EXCELLENT. WE DECIDED TO LAND AT ORF INSTEAD OF TURNING BACK TO PHF BECAUSE PHF TWR HAD JUST CLOSED, THE CFR FACILITIES WERE NOT AS READILY AVAILABLE, ORF WAS IN SIGHT, STRAIGHT AHEAD. BY THE TIME WE HAD FINISHED WITH CHKLISTS AND FULLY SECURED THE #1 ENG THE DISTANCE TO ORF WAS ABOUT THE SAME (10 MI).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.