Narrative:

We were cleared to deviate as necessary around a line of thunderstorms which extended east/west from about evansville to 30 mi south of ind. Our WX radar seemed to be doing a good job of painting this line. We deviated west to an area which looked to be light rain only. ZID questioned this choice and described the line as 'pretty solid,' but said he wasn't painting everything. It was 'coming in and out.' that agreed with what our radar was showing in general, but the specific area we were headed for looked good. At that time of day it was hard to see any possible buildups well. When we switched to approach control, we overheard PIREPS from another air carrier ahead who had just gone through the same area. He called it heavy rain and occasional moderate turbulence, but lasting only briefly. Shortly afterwards, we were also in heavy rain and turbulence and received a lightning strike. Aircraft system were unaffected, so could only be determined during postflt inspection. A number of rivets were popped and 2 passenger window frames badly damaged. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter flies the B727-200. There was no problem with the electronics because of the strike. Several rivets were popped along with 2 passenger window frames damaged. 1 static wick was also blown away. The reporter followed another air carrier aircraft through the area that had no problem. The reporter regrets that he did not ask for more help from ATC. He believes that his radar was working properly and recognizes that his radar does a better job painting WX than does the ARTCC radar.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B727-200 CAPT RPTS A LIGHTNING STRIKE APCHING IND.

Narrative: WE WERE CLRED TO DEVIATE AS NECESSARY AROUND A LINE OF TSTMS WHICH EXTENDED E/W FROM ABOUT EVANSVILLE TO 30 MI S OF IND. OUR WX RADAR SEEMED TO BE DOING A GOOD JOB OF PAINTING THIS LINE. WE DEVIATED W TO AN AREA WHICH LOOKED TO BE LIGHT RAIN ONLY. ZID QUESTIONED THIS CHOICE AND DESCRIBED THE LINE AS 'PRETTY SOLID,' BUT SAID HE WASN'T PAINTING EVERYTHING. IT WAS 'COMING IN AND OUT.' THAT AGREED WITH WHAT OUR RADAR WAS SHOWING IN GENERAL, BUT THE SPECIFIC AREA WE WERE HEADED FOR LOOKED GOOD. AT THAT TIME OF DAY IT WAS HARD TO SEE ANY POSSIBLE BUILDUPS WELL. WHEN WE SWITCHED TO APCH CTL, WE OVERHEARD PIREPS FROM ANOTHER ACR AHEAD WHO HAD JUST GONE THROUGH THE SAME AREA. HE CALLED IT HVY RAIN AND OCCASIONAL MODERATE TURB, BUT LASTING ONLY BRIEFLY. SHORTLY AFTERWARDS, WE WERE ALSO IN HVY RAIN AND TURB AND RECEIVED A LIGHTNING STRIKE. ACFT SYS WERE UNAFFECTED, SO COULD ONLY BE DETERMINED DURING POSTFLT INSPECTION. A NUMBER OF RIVETS WERE POPPED AND 2 PAX WINDOW FRAMES BADLY DAMAGED. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR FLIES THE B727-200. THERE WAS NO PROB WITH THE ELECTRONICS BECAUSE OF THE STRIKE. SEVERAL RIVETS WERE POPPED ALONG WITH 2 PAX WINDOW FRAMES DAMAGED. 1 STATIC WICK WAS ALSO BLOWN AWAY. THE RPTR FOLLOWED ANOTHER ACR ACFT THROUGH THE AREA THAT HAD NO PROB. THE RPTR REGRETS THAT HE DID NOT ASK FOR MORE HELP FROM ATC. HE BELIEVES THAT HIS RADAR WAS WORKING PROPERLY AND RECOGNIZES THAT HIS RADAR DOES A BETTER JOB PAINTING WX THAN DOES THE ARTCC RADAR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.