37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 375118 |
Time | |
Date | 199707 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : vny |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 4000 msl bound upper : 4000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : bur |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Beechcraft Twin Turboprop Jet Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude cruise other |
Route In Use | departure sid : sid enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | PA-46 Malibu |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : instrument pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 6000 flight time type : 250 |
ASRS Report | 375118 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 4000 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 375528 |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure non adherence : required legal separation other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : unspecified other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : became reoriented other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 1000 vertical : 300 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Departed IFR on a SID, CANOGA7. Set #2 HSI 342 degrees inbound to gmn VOR heading 210 degrees. #2 centered turned inbound. Should have stayed on 210 degree vectors for vny thence, I was on top in VFR on an IFR flight plan. Told #4, then #6, never a heading as I recall. Turned and during turn told about traffic. Saw malibu don't recall exact position of malibu it was close. ATC asked where I was going at time sensing something not right. Told to 'turn to 250 degrees, then resume to 300 degrees' given a number to call when I land. Malibu reported a close call. As the event unfolded I thought something was not right and realized I should have stayed heading 210 degrees. I have been flying for many yrs and instructed as well. I am a FAA accident prevention counselor and I have made mistakes before but never deviated from a SID nor any accidents nor violations. We all learn most I think from mistakes and hopefully live. I was under a moderate workload and just plain as day turned for no reason other than a centered needle without thinking. Maybe if I was given a heading by ATC when initially called that would have made a difference. They may have but I did read back the new assigned altitude. In the future I will double/double-check before I turn and not to cause a problem with safety for others.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A BE200 FAILS TO FOLLOW A SID WHEN FLYING THROUGH BUR, CA, AIRSPACE. THIS NAV DEV CAUSES A CONFLICT WITH A PIPER MALIBU.
Narrative: DEPARTED IFR ON A SID, CANOGA7. SET #2 HSI 342 DEGS INBOUND TO GMN VOR HDG 210 DEGS. #2 CTRED TURNED INBOUND. SHOULD HAVE STAYED ON 210 DEG VECTORS FOR VNY THENCE, I WAS ON TOP IN VFR ON AN IFR FLT PLAN. TOLD #4, THEN #6, NEVER A HEADING AS I RECALL. TURNED AND DURING TURN TOLD ABOUT TFC. SAW MALIBU DON'T RECALL EXACT POS OF MALIBU IT WAS CLOSE. ATC ASKED WHERE I WAS GOING AT TIME SENSING SOMETHING NOT RIGHT. TOLD TO 'TURN TO 250 DEGS, THEN RESUME TO 300 DEGS' GIVEN A NUMBER TO CALL WHEN I LAND. MALIBU RPTED A CLOSE CALL. AS THE EVENT UNFOLDED I THOUGHT SOMETHING WAS NOT RIGHT AND REALIZED I SHOULD HAVE STAYED HDG 210 DEGS. I HAVE BEEN FLYING FOR MANY YRS AND INSTRUCTED AS WELL. I AM A FAA ACCIDENT PREVENTION COUNSELOR AND I HAVE MADE MISTAKES BEFORE BUT NEVER DEVIATED FROM A SID NOR ANY ACCIDENTS NOR VIOLATIONS. WE ALL LEARN MOST I THINK FROM MISTAKES AND HOPEFULLY LIVE. I WAS UNDER A MODERATE WORKLOAD AND JUST PLAIN AS DAY TURNED FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN A CTRED NEEDLE WITHOUT THINKING. MAYBE IF I WAS GIVEN A HEADING BY ATC WHEN INITIALLY CALLED THAT WOULD HAVE MADE A DIFFERENCE. THEY MAY HAVE BUT I DID READ BACK THE NEW ASSIGNED ALT. IN THE FUTURE I WILL DOUBLE/DOUBLE-CHK BEFORE I TURN AND NOT TO CAUSE A PROB WITH SAFETY FOR OTHERS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.