 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Air carrier freighter crew is confused as to route of flight after getting a vector direct linden. Their concept was a clearance over sacramento. Crew had to ask ATC about routing after linden. Crew missed the amended clearance on their pre departure clearance at oak.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 380292 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199709 |
| Day | Fri |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | atc facility : lin |
| State Reference | CA |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | artcc : zoa |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | DC-10 30F |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
| Route In Use | departure other departure sid : sid enroute : on vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 1200 |
| ASRS Report | 380292 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure non adherence other other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance |
| Consequence | Other |
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation other |
Narrative:
On preflight we set up our departure according to our flight plan which was the oak 4 departure to sac, etc. When we got our pre departure clearance we overlooked the amendment (which was oak 4.lin) but did see the original clearance to sac. On departure, ATC cleared us direct linden then flight planned route, which we did after verifying where to go after linden because our flight plan was to sacramento. ATC told us to fly lin J84 MVA, etc, which was what we overlooked on the amended clearance. There was never any conflict and we complied with all ATC instructions. A copy of the pre departure clearance is enclosed.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR FREIGHTER CREW IS CONFUSED AS TO RTE OF FLT AFTER GETTING A VECTOR DIRECT LINDEN. THEIR CONCEPT WAS A CLRNC OVER SACRAMENTO. CREW HAD TO ASK ATC ABOUT ROUTING AFTER LINDEN. CREW MISSED THE AMENDED CLRNC ON THEIR PDC AT OAK.
Narrative: ON PREFLT WE SET UP OUR DEP ACCORDING TO OUR FLT PLAN WHICH WAS THE OAK 4 DEP TO SAC, ETC. WHEN WE GOT OUR PDC WE OVERLOOKED THE AMENDMENT (WHICH WAS OAK 4.LIN) BUT DID SEE THE ORIGINAL CLRNC TO SAC. ON DEP, ATC CLRED US DIRECT LINDEN THEN FLT PLANNED RTE, WHICH WE DID AFTER VERIFYING WHERE TO GO AFTER LINDEN BECAUSE OUR FLT PLAN WAS TO SACRAMENTO. ATC TOLD US TO FLY LIN J84 MVA, ETC, WHICH WAS WHAT WE OVERLOOKED ON THE AMENDED CLRNC. THERE WAS NEVER ANY CONFLICT AND WE COMPLIED WITH ALL ATC INSTRUCTIONS. A COPY OF THE PDC IS ENCLOSED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.