37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 387702 |
Time | |
Date | 199712 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B767-300 and 300 ER |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | other personnel other |
Qualification | other other : other |
ASRS Report | 387702 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | observation : air carrier inspector |
Qualification | other other : other |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
On the night of dec/xx/97 I was part of a group of mechanics assigned to perform a layover inspection on aircraft YYY, a B767-er that air carrier purchased from xyz. This aircraft was flown up from the maintenance facility, XXX, where it had undergone extensive modifications. This being the case, I performed only a cursory inspection of the cargo compartment for condition and security, as I believed the cargo compartment had been inspected and repaired as necessary as part of its presvc checks while at XXX. Because I did not see any 'big pieces' missing, I believed the cargo compartment was ok for service. Upon inspection, the FAA inspector found some of the joint sealing tape was loose, and a compartment light trim ring was found to be unsecured, causing the ceiling panel to sag. The unsecured trim ring and the loose tape were probably a result of being removed while at XXX, and not being properly documented, they were never reinstalled. Several other mechanics had been in the cargo compartments at one point or another, and none had noted the defects, however, none of us expected to find problems like this from an aircraft that had just undergone major maintenance and had not yet been put back into service.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B767-300 WAS DISPATCHED AFTER HVY MAINT WAS PERFORMED WITH A CARGO COMPARTMENT CEILING PANEL IMPROPERLY REPAIRED.
Narrative: ON THE NIGHT OF DEC/XX/97 I WAS PART OF A GROUP OF MECHS ASSIGNED TO PERFORM A LAYOVER INSPECTION ON ACFT YYY, A B767-ER THAT ACR PURCHASED FROM XYZ. THIS ACFT WAS FLOWN UP FROM THE MAINT FACILITY, XXX, WHERE IT HAD UNDERGONE EXTENSIVE MODIFICATIONS. THIS BEING THE CASE, I PERFORMED ONLY A CURSORY INSPECTION OF THE CARGO COMPARTMENT FOR CONDITION AND SECURITY, AS I BELIEVED THE CARGO COMPARTMENT HAD BEEN INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS NECESSARY AS PART OF ITS PRESVC CHKS WHILE AT XXX. BECAUSE I DID NOT SEE ANY 'BIG PIECES' MISSING, I BELIEVED THE CARGO COMPARTMENT WAS OK FOR SVC. UPON INSPECTION, THE FAA INSPECTOR FOUND SOME OF THE JOINT SEALING TAPE WAS LOOSE, AND A COMPARTMENT LIGHT TRIM RING WAS FOUND TO BE UNSECURED, CAUSING THE CEILING PANEL TO SAG. THE UNSECURED TRIM RING AND THE LOOSE TAPE WERE PROBABLY A RESULT OF BEING REMOVED WHILE AT XXX, AND NOT BEING PROPERLY DOCUMENTED, THEY WERE NEVER REINSTALLED. SEVERAL OTHER MECHANICS HAD BEEN IN THE CARGO COMPARTMENTS AT ONE POINT OR ANOTHER, AND NONE HAD NOTED THE DEFECTS, HOWEVER, NONE OF US EXPECTED TO FIND PROBS LIKE THIS FROM AN ACFT THAT HAD JUST UNDERGONE MAJOR MAINT AND HAD NOT YET BEEN PUT BACK INTO SVC.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.