Narrative:

While on a GPS-B approach to hio, portland approach control asked if I was on the GPS-B approach. I said 'yes' and we discussed my location relative to the NDB. I then noticed my error, informed them I was in VFR conditions and canceled IFR. They handed me over to tower and I landed without incident. I had entered the GPS-a with IAF of ubg instead of GPS-B with IAF ubg into the KLN90B. The initial leg on the wrong approach was nearly parallel to the initial leg on the correct approach. Without knowing this I entered obs mode on the IAF and began timing of the outbound leg, procedure turn, etc, based on the wrong waypoint. This put my entire procedure off by several mi, but nevertheless in the area where the correct procedure would have been flown. This initially added confusion and time to clearly understand what had happened when approach called. This mistake is similar to one I made 2 weeks ago and has underlined for me the need to be more familiar with the approach waypoints I load before using them.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PLT OF SMA ON GPS APCH IS OFF COURSE AND ATC QUERIES HIM. HE IS IN VMC AND CANCELS IFR. DISCOVERS HE PROGRAMMED THE WRONG APCH INTO THE GPS.

Narrative: WHILE ON A GPS-B APCH TO HIO, PORTLAND APCH CTL ASKED IF I WAS ON THE GPS-B APCH. I SAID 'YES' AND WE DISCUSSED MY LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE NDB. I THEN NOTICED MY ERROR, INFORMED THEM I WAS IN VFR CONDITIONS AND CANCELED IFR. THEY HANDED ME OVER TO TWR AND I LANDED WITHOUT INCIDENT. I HAD ENTERED THE GPS-A WITH IAF OF UBG INSTEAD OF GPS-B WITH IAF UBG INTO THE KLN90B. THE INITIAL LEG ON THE WRONG APCH WAS NEARLY PARALLEL TO THE INITIAL LEG ON THE CORRECT APCH. WITHOUT KNOWING THIS I ENTERED OBS MODE ON THE IAF AND BEGAN TIMING OF THE OUTBOUND LEG, PROC TURN, ETC, BASED ON THE WRONG WAYPOINT. THIS PUT MY ENTIRE PROC OFF BY SEVERAL MI, BUT NEVERTHELESS IN THE AREA WHERE THE CORRECT PROC WOULD HAVE BEEN FLOWN. THIS INITIALLY ADDED CONFUSION AND TIME TO CLEARLY UNDERSTAND WHAT HAD HAPPENED WHEN APCH CALLED. THIS MISTAKE IS SIMILAR TO ONE I MADE 2 WKS AGO AND HAS UNDERLINED FOR ME THE NEED TO BE MORE FAMILIAR WITH THE APCH WAYPOINTS I LOAD BEFORE USING THEM.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.