Narrative:

Flight from phx to lax. We are given the pdz 2 arrival. This arrival is unsafe due to the amount of head work it takes and not looking outside for traffic. But to make things worse, they switch to the civet 3 arrival, which is not as busy (socal) or bad as the pdz 2. So now, you get set up on the civet, socal approach vectors you off to join the mitts 1 arrival to land on the north side on runway 24R. This is very dangerous due to the amount of work it takes the crew to set up and adjust to the new STAR. No one is flying the aircraft or looking outside for traffic. This is the same bs STAR like the jammn in slc. What does it take to fix this problem? Maybe after foreign airlines crash over los angeles, maybe socal will get the message! This is a bull shit STAR that needs to be fixed!

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLC OF MLG COMPLAINS OF THE STAR PROCS AT LAX BEING COMPLICATED AND REQUIRING HEADS DOWN ON APCH -- TOO MUCH HEAD WORK AND NOT LOOKING OUTSIDE. CHANGE OF STAR 3 TIMES ALSO BECAME A PROB.

Narrative: FLT FROM PHX TO LAX. WE ARE GIVEN THE PDZ 2 ARR. THIS ARR IS UNSAFE DUE TO THE AMOUNT OF HEAD WORK IT TAKES AND NOT LOOKING OUTSIDE FOR TFC. BUT TO MAKE THINGS WORSE, THEY SWITCH TO THE CIVET 3 ARR, WHICH IS NOT AS BUSY (SOCAL) OR BAD AS THE PDZ 2. SO NOW, YOU GET SET UP ON THE CIVET, SOCAL APCH VECTORS YOU OFF TO JOIN THE MITTS 1 ARR TO LAND ON THE N SIDE ON RWY 24R. THIS IS VERY DANGEROUS DUE TO THE AMOUNT OF WORK IT TAKES THE CREW TO SET UP AND ADJUST TO THE NEW STAR. NO ONE IS FLYING THE ACFT OR LOOKING OUTSIDE FOR TFC. THIS IS THE SAME BS STAR LIKE THE JAMMN IN SLC. WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO FIX THIS PROB? MAYBE AFTER FOREIGN AIRLINES CRASH OVER LOS ANGELES, MAYBE SOCAL WILL GET THE MESSAGE! THIS IS A BULL SHIT STAR THAT NEEDS TO BE FIXED!

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.