37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 402700 |
Time | |
Date | 199805 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : pdx |
State Reference | OR |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1900 msl bound upper : 2500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : pdx |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : straight in arrival other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 1875 flight time type : 94 |
ASRS Report | 402700 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 130 flight time total : 5540 flight time type : 1665 |
ASRS Report | 402958 |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : unspecified other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : became reoriented flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I was the PF (the first officer) and the captain was the PNF. At about 10 DME on the runway 28R localizer at pdx we were 'cleared for the approach' and to maintain 2500 ft until established on the localizer. I was already descending and in the descent mode of the autoplt prior to the clearance and selected the 'approach' mode on the autoplt once cleared for the approach. The autoplt was already captured on the localizer and the GS was armed. The autoplt continued to descend below the GS and therefore did not capture it. I did not understand fully the mode of the autoplt and that it would never capture once selecting 'approach.' I assumed it was captured when I saw that we were a DOT below and called for gear down, before landing checklist. The captain proceeded with the checklist and when he returned to the instruments we were 2 dots low at 1900 ft. I put too much emphasis on other instruments and too much trust of the autoplt that it had captured the GS. The captain called for immediate power and to climb. ATC then issued a low altitude report. We returned to the GS, broke out of the clouds and landed visually. I was low time in the aircraft and got too busy monitoring other instruments assuming the autoplt was captured. We thoroughly discussed those issues and the modes of the autoplt when we returned to the gate. No GPWS warnings were received and ATC acted accordingly in the interest of safety after we realized the deviation. Supplemental information from acn 402958: the first officer was low time in the aircraft and total time. Though a quick learner, with an excellent attitude, experience was a factor with the situation. Failure to observe and correct GS deviation occurred while assuming the autoplt was coupled.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A COMMUTER FLC ALLOWS THEIR ACFT TO DSND BELOW THE GS WHEN THEY FAIL TO REALIZE THAT THE GS AUTO CAPTURE IS NOT FUNCTIONING.
Narrative: I WAS THE PF (THE FO) AND THE CAPT WAS THE PNF. AT ABOUT 10 DME ON THE RWY 28R LOC AT PDX WE WERE 'CLRED FOR THE APCH' AND TO MAINTAIN 2500 FT UNTIL ESTABLISHED ON THE LOC. I WAS ALREADY DSNDING AND IN THE DSCNT MODE OF THE AUTOPLT PRIOR TO THE CLRNC AND SELECTED THE 'APCH' MODE ON THE AUTOPLT ONCE CLRED FOR THE APCH. THE AUTOPLT WAS ALREADY CAPTURED ON THE LOC AND THE GS WAS ARMED. THE AUTOPLT CONTINUED TO DSND BELOW THE GS AND THEREFORE DID NOT CAPTURE IT. I DID NOT UNDERSTAND FULLY THE MODE OF THE AUTOPLT AND THAT IT WOULD NEVER CAPTURE ONCE SELECTING 'APCH.' I ASSUMED IT WAS CAPTURED WHEN I SAW THAT WE WERE A DOT BELOW AND CALLED FOR GEAR DOWN, BEFORE LNDG CHKLIST. THE CAPT PROCEEDED WITH THE CHKLIST AND WHEN HE RETURNED TO THE INSTS WE WERE 2 DOTS LOW AT 1900 FT. I PUT TOO MUCH EMPHASIS ON OTHER INSTS AND TOO MUCH TRUST OF THE AUTOPLT THAT IT HAD CAPTURED THE GS. THE CAPT CALLED FOR IMMEDIATE PWR AND TO CLB. ATC THEN ISSUED A LOW ALT RPT. WE RETURNED TO THE GS, BROKE OUT OF THE CLOUDS AND LANDED VISUALLY. I WAS LOW TIME IN THE ACFT AND GOT TOO BUSY MONITORING OTHER INSTS ASSUMING THE AUTOPLT WAS CAPTURED. WE THOROUGHLY DISCUSSED THOSE ISSUES AND THE MODES OF THE AUTOPLT WHEN WE RETURNED TO THE GATE. NO GPWS WARNINGS WERE RECEIVED AND ATC ACTED ACCORDINGLY IN THE INTEREST OF SAFETY AFTER WE REALIZED THE DEV. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 402958: THE FO WAS LOW TIME IN THE ACFT AND TOTAL TIME. THOUGH A QUICK LEARNER, WITH AN EXCELLENT ATTITUDE, EXPERIENCE WAS A FACTOR WITH THE SIT. FAILURE TO OBSERVE AND CORRECT GS DEV OCCURRED WHILE ASSUMING THE AUTOPLT WAS COUPLED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.