Narrative:

While radar training, an altitude was issued (FL240) to the B767. The radar tracker was on a landline and did not hear the clearance. Several mins passed with FL260 (not FL240) in the data block. The traffic, a BE36, was at FL250 and called to the B767. The radar trainee said 'I'll have lower clearing that traffic.' the B767 said 'roger' but did not take any action to stop the controller's error, such as questioning the clearance. Separation lost was 1 mi and 900 ft. We had 4 controllers plugged in and no one caught this. More awareness needed from everyone involved.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A TRAINEE ARTCC RADAR CTLR INADVERTENTLY ISSUED A DSCNT TO A B767 TO FL240 WITH AN IFR BE36 AT FL250 RESULTING IN LOSS OF SEPARATION. THE INSTRUCTOR CTLR STATES THAT WITH 4 CTLRS PLUGGED IN, NO ONE CAUGHT THE MISTAKE.

Narrative: WHILE RADAR TRAINING, AN ALT WAS ISSUED (FL240) TO THE B767. THE RADAR TRACKER WAS ON A LANDLINE AND DID NOT HEAR THE CLRNC. SEVERAL MINS PASSED WITH FL260 (NOT FL240) IN THE DATA BLOCK. THE TFC, A BE36, WAS AT FL250 AND CALLED TO THE B767. THE RADAR TRAINEE SAID 'I'LL HAVE LOWER CLRING THAT TFC.' THE B767 SAID 'ROGER' BUT DID NOT TAKE ANY ACTION TO STOP THE CTLR'S ERROR, SUCH AS QUESTIONING THE CLRNC. SEPARATION LOST WAS 1 MI AND 900 FT. WE HAD 4 CTLRS PLUGGED IN AND NO ONE CAUGHT THIS. MORE AWARENESS NEEDED FROM EVERYONE INVOLVED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.