37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 407902 |
Time | |
Date | 199807 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : hfd |
State Reference | CT |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 11000 msl bound upper : 11500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : bdl |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Beech 1900 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | King Air C90 E90 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 5600 flight time type : 4000 |
ASRS Report | 407902 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 2677 flight time type : 1500 |
ASRS Report | 408048 |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude conflict : nmac non adherence : clearance non adherence : required legal separation other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 100 vertical : 100 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
From our position listed above, we noticed, but were unable to visually acquire, an aircraft on our TCASII scope at 2 O'clock position and 10 mi. This aircraft was in a slow climb from 300 ft below our altitude. Approach called this aircraft and gave him traffic 'a beechcraft 1900 at 10 O'clock position and 10 mi at 11000 ft.' the aircraft said he had us in sight and was told to maintain visual separation with us. Approach then called us with traffic. However, just as he spoke we received a TCASII RA 2500 FPM climb, which we obeyed because the traffic was not in sight. The traffic was already 200 ft above us so this RA took us through their altitude. Approach wanted us to descend to 7000 ft, but we told him we were in a TCASII climb. Now, safely above the traffic, the TCASII commanded a 2500 FPM descent. We ignored this RA because we saw the aircraft pass beneath us. This second RA also wanted us to pass through the altitude of the traffic. When we first told the controller we were in a TCASII climb, he asked why we had to climb if the other aircraft had us in sight. I explained that we didn't have him in sight. I believe the controller's confusion about when we must act on an RA, contributed to allowing the other aircraft close enough to cause an RA. I also believe the other aircraft, not having TCASII, doesn't understand how much room to give a TCASII equipped aircraft so as not to give them an RA. Pointing out traffic to IFR aircraft before VFR aircraft may also help to avoid this situation. Supplemental information from acn 408048: approach never called out VFR king air traffic out to us. I, as copilot (PF) immediately responded to TCASII yellow intruder traffic, traffic command. The captain asked if I saw traffic. I responded yes, saw aircraft pass below our right outboard wingtip approximately 100 ft below and 25 ft horizontally diagonally towards our 8 O'clock rear position.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR BE02 FLC AWARE OF CLBING BE90 TFC, BUT NO VISUAL CONTACT. BE90 HAS BE02 IN SIGHT AND COMMENCES VFR CLB. BE02 TCASII RA CLB MANEUVER INITIATED WHEN BE90 IS ALREADY ABOVE THE BE02. BE02 CLBS THROUGH BE90 ALT, AND RECEIVES A TCASII RA DSCNT COMMAND, BUT IS ARRESTED BY PIC. ATC TRIED TO STOP CLB ACTION, BUT BE02 PIC ADVISES THEY WILL FOLLOW RA COMMAND.
Narrative: FROM OUR POS LISTED ABOVE, WE NOTICED, BUT WERE UNABLE TO VISUALLY ACQUIRE, AN ACFT ON OUR TCASII SCOPE AT 2 O'CLOCK POS AND 10 MI. THIS ACFT WAS IN A SLOW CLB FROM 300 FT BELOW OUR ALT. APCH CALLED THIS ACFT AND GAVE HIM TFC 'A BEECHCRAFT 1900 AT 10 O'CLOCK POS AND 10 MI AT 11000 FT.' THE ACFT SAID HE HAD US IN SIGHT AND WAS TOLD TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION WITH US. APCH THEN CALLED US WITH TFC. HOWEVER, JUST AS HE SPOKE WE RECEIVED A TCASII RA 2500 FPM CLB, WHICH WE OBEYED BECAUSE THE TFC WAS NOT IN SIGHT. THE TFC WAS ALREADY 200 FT ABOVE US SO THIS RA TOOK US THROUGH THEIR ALT. APCH WANTED US TO DSND TO 7000 FT, BUT WE TOLD HIM WE WERE IN A TCASII CLB. NOW, SAFELY ABOVE THE TFC, THE TCASII COMMANDED A 2500 FPM DSCNT. WE IGNORED THIS RA BECAUSE WE SAW THE ACFT PASS BENEATH US. THIS SECOND RA ALSO WANTED US TO PASS THROUGH THE ALT OF THE TFC. WHEN WE FIRST TOLD THE CTLR WE WERE IN A TCASII CLB, HE ASKED WHY WE HAD TO CLB IF THE OTHER ACFT HAD US IN SIGHT. I EXPLAINED THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE HIM IN SIGHT. I BELIEVE THE CTLR'S CONFUSION ABOUT WHEN WE MUST ACT ON AN RA, CONTRIBUTED TO ALLOWING THE OTHER ACFT CLOSE ENOUGH TO CAUSE AN RA. I ALSO BELIEVE THE OTHER ACFT, NOT HAVING TCASII, DOESN'T UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH ROOM TO GIVE A TCASII EQUIPPED ACFT SO AS NOT TO GIVE THEM AN RA. POINTING OUT TFC TO IFR ACFT BEFORE VFR ACFT MAY ALSO HELP TO AVOID THIS SIT. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 408048: APCH NEVER CALLED OUT VFR KING AIR TFC OUT TO US. I, AS COPLT (PF) IMMEDIATELY RESPONDED TO TCASII YELLOW INTRUDER TFC, TFC COMMAND. THE CAPT ASKED IF I SAW TFC. I RESPONDED YES, SAW ACFT PASS BELOW OUR R OUTBOARD WINGTIP APPROX 100 FT BELOW AND 25 FT HORIZLY DIAGONALLY TOWARDS OUR 8 O'CLOCK REAR POS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.