37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 414299 |
Time | |
Date | 199809 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : gup |
State Reference | NM |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | other : unknown |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 900 flight time type : 150 |
ASRS Report | 414299 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : ground critical non adherence : far other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action flight crew : rejected takeoff |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 20 vertical : 30 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
I was with one of my students on an instrument cross country. We were departing gallup, NM. The runway alignment is 6/24. Wind was less than 5 KTS. Runway 24 is closer to the terminal, but there were 2 airplanes arriving runway 6 and we decided to use runway 6. The second airplane landed, and as he was taxiing to the ramp, he was carrying on a conversation on CTAF with another pilot. Once they got off the radio, my student called departing runway 6. We taxied into position and started our takeoff roll. My student just called out 60 KTS when I saw movement at the far end of the runway. I immediately took the controls, reduced throttle and stopped the airplane, heading to the left side of the runway. The other pilot continued his takeoff roll and rotated less than 500 ft in front of us. The other pilot didn't seem too concerned about the incident. We never heard the other pilot make a call on the radio. 1 of 2 things happened. Either we unknowingly stepped on each other, which seems unlikely because one of us should have had a longer transmission and as a result should have been heard by the other. The other situation is that the other pilot did not make a radio call.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: INSTRUCTOR PLT OF AN SMA TOOK OVER CTL OF THE ACFT DURING TKOF ROLL FROM HIS INST PLT STUDENT WHEN HE NOTICED ANOTHER ACFT TAKING OFF FROM THE OPPOSITE END OF THEIR RWY AND COMING RIGHT AT THEM. INSTRUCTOR PLT ABORTED TKOF AND WENT OVER TO THE SIDE OF THE RWY. THE OTHER ACFT MISSED THEM BY 30 FT.
Narrative: I WAS WITH ONE OF MY STUDENTS ON AN INST XCOUNTRY. WE WERE DEPARTING GALLUP, NM. THE RWY ALIGNMENT IS 6/24. WIND WAS LESS THAN 5 KTS. RWY 24 IS CLOSER TO THE TERMINAL, BUT THERE WERE 2 AIRPLANES ARRIVING RWY 6 AND WE DECIDED TO USE RWY 6. THE SECOND AIRPLANE LANDED, AND AS HE WAS TAXIING TO THE RAMP, HE WAS CARRYING ON A CONVERSATION ON CTAF WITH ANOTHER PLT. ONCE THEY GOT OFF THE RADIO, MY STUDENT CALLED DEPARTING RWY 6. WE TAXIED INTO POS AND STARTED OUR TKOF ROLL. MY STUDENT JUST CALLED OUT 60 KTS WHEN I SAW MOVEMENT AT THE FAR END OF THE RWY. I IMMEDIATELY TOOK THE CTLS, REDUCED THROTTLE AND STOPPED THE AIRPLANE, HDG TO THE L SIDE OF THE RWY. THE OTHER PLT CONTINUED HIS TKOF ROLL AND ROTATED LESS THAN 500 FT IN FRONT OF US. THE OTHER PLT DIDN'T SEEM TOO CONCERNED ABOUT THE INCIDENT. WE NEVER HEARD THE OTHER PLT MAKE A CALL ON THE RADIO. 1 OF 2 THINGS HAPPENED. EITHER WE UNKNOWINGLY STEPPED ON EACH OTHER, WHICH SEEMS UNLIKELY BECAUSE ONE OF US SHOULD HAVE HAD A LONGER XMISSION AND AS A RESULT SHOULD HAVE BEEN HEARD BY THE OTHER. THE OTHER SIT IS THAT THE OTHER PLT DID NOT MAKE A RADIO CALL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.