Narrative:

On ILS/visual approach to runway 32 at pit, we landed on runway 32 without being switched to pit tower. We were vectored for landing runway 32 with speed being controled by approach control. We were never advised to switch to tower frequency for landing and we did not discover this until after landing. The runway was clear and no other aircraft were involved. I called tower after landing and was told that we were cleared to land.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN F100 ACFT LANDS AT PIT WITHOUT RECEIVING LNDG CLRNC. FO HAD NOT SWITCHED TO TWR. CREW CITES APCH CTLR'S FAILURE TO TURN THEM OVER TO TWR AS CAUSAL.

Narrative: ON ILS/VISUAL APCH TO RWY 32 AT PIT, WE LANDED ON RWY 32 WITHOUT BEING SWITCHED TO PIT TWR. WE WERE VECTORED FOR LNDG RWY 32 WITH SPD BEING CTLED BY APCH CTL. WE WERE NEVER ADVISED TO SWITCH TO TWR FREQ FOR LNDG AND WE DID NOT DISCOVER THIS UNTIL AFTER LNDG. THE RWY WAS CLR AND NO OTHER ACFT WERE INVOLVED. I CALLED TWR AFTER LNDG AND WAS TOLD THAT WE WERE CLRED TO LAND.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.