37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 421447 |
Time | |
Date | 199811 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lhq |
State Reference | OH |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 3000 msl bound upper : 3000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 30 flight time total : 1200 flight time type : 300 |
ASRS Report | 421447 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : departure |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I make this trip at least once a month. IFR clearance always same, including 'enter controled airspace on heading of 100 degrees,' which is my on course heading. This time clearance same except for '...enter controled airspace on heading of 180 degrees.' I was in a hurry to get to family dinner -- I was late. I could not understand why the different clearance. I 'needed' to get 'on heading' quickly. I figured I would get the heading as soon as I called controller. I was cleared 'as filed' anyway. So, I just continued my turn from the west, through 180 degrees to 100 degrees as I called in. Controller questioned my heading. I responded 'but I was cleared as filed.' he stated I should have turned to 180 degrees and waited until I was given heading change to get on course. I guess deep down I knew that. But I was late and in a hurry. Also, it was a different heading than the usual clearance. I guess I rationalized to myself why I should indeed get on course as soon as possible because of my hurry. I should have followed the clearance properly since I did not know what other traffic was in the area that the controller was working. Even though it was VMC, the nose high attitude for climb out is sub-optimal for see and avoid practices.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PLT OF AN SEL SMA ON IFR FLT PLAN DEP TURNED BEYOND ATC CLRNC HDG TO MORE QUICKLY GET ON FLT PLAN COURSE CAUSING ATC TO INTERVENE AND QUESTION WHY HE HAD OVERTURNED.
Narrative: I MAKE THIS TRIP AT LEAST ONCE A MONTH. IFR CLRNC ALWAYS SAME, INCLUDING 'ENTER CTLED AIRSPACE ON HDG OF 100 DEGS,' WHICH IS MY ON COURSE HDG. THIS TIME CLRNC SAME EXCEPT FOR '...ENTER CTLED AIRSPACE ON HDG OF 180 DEGS.' I WAS IN A HURRY TO GET TO FAMILY DINNER -- I WAS LATE. I COULD NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE DIFFERENT CLRNC. I 'NEEDED' TO GET 'ON HDG' QUICKLY. I FIGURED I WOULD GET THE HDG AS SOON AS I CALLED CTLR. I WAS CLRED 'AS FILED' ANYWAY. SO, I JUST CONTINUED MY TURN FROM THE W, THROUGH 180 DEGS TO 100 DEGS AS I CALLED IN. CTLR QUESTIONED MY HDG. I RESPONDED 'BUT I WAS CLRED AS FILED.' HE STATED I SHOULD HAVE TURNED TO 180 DEGS AND WAITED UNTIL I WAS GIVEN HDG CHANGE TO GET ON COURSE. I GUESS DEEP DOWN I KNEW THAT. BUT I WAS LATE AND IN A HURRY. ALSO, IT WAS A DIFFERENT HDG THAN THE USUAL CLRNC. I GUESS I RATIONALIZED TO MYSELF WHY I SHOULD INDEED GET ON COURSE ASAP BECAUSE OF MY HURRY. I SHOULD HAVE FOLLOWED THE CLRNC PROPERLY SINCE I DID NOT KNOW WHAT OTHER TFC WAS IN THE AREA THAT THE CTLR WAS WORKING. EVEN THOUGH IT WAS VMC, THE NOSE HIGH ATTITUDE FOR CLBOUT IS SUB-OPTIMAL FOR SEE AND AVOID PRACTICES.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.