Narrative:

The main thing I am filing this report is to state that I feel the VOR approach to brown field is difficult -- almost to the point of being dangerous with the existing minimums. It is difficult to identify the field with low visibility from some 2 mi out, make a turn keeping the field in contact, and setting up for landing. My airplane is relatively slow, but in a heavier, faster aircraft I would think it would be very difficult with those minimums. I had contact momentarily then lost it and made a missed approach with a subsequent landing at lindbergh. Incidentally, the briefing indicated 1800 ft scattered, 3000 ft overcast with improving conditions. That was not the case.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: C185 PLT QUESTIONS FEASIBILITY OF PUBLISHED MINIMUMS ON APCH CHART IN SAN AIRSPACE.

Narrative: THE MAIN THING I AM FILING THIS RPT IS TO STATE THAT I FEEL THE VOR APCH TO BROWN FIELD IS DIFFICULT -- ALMOST TO THE POINT OF BEING DANGEROUS WITH THE EXISTING MINIMUMS. IT IS DIFFICULT TO IDENT THE FIELD WITH LOW VISIBILITY FROM SOME 2 MI OUT, MAKE A TURN KEEPING THE FIELD IN CONTACT, AND SETTING UP FOR LNDG. MY AIRPLANE IS RELATIVELY SLOW, BUT IN A HEAVIER, FASTER ACFT I WOULD THINK IT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT WITH THOSE MINIMUMS. I HAD CONTACT MOMENTARILY THEN LOST IT AND MADE A MISSED APCH WITH A SUBSEQUENT LNDG AT LINDBERGH. INCIDENTALLY, THE BRIEFING INDICATED 1800 FT SCATTERED, 3000 FT OVCST WITH IMPROVING CONDITIONS. THAT WAS NOT THE CASE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.