Narrative:

We were completing the VOR-a approach, circle overhead for a left downwind for runway 19. On midfield downwind, the tower asked us to slow speed for traffic ahead. I slowed to approximately 140 KTS. We received no other instructions from the tower controller. I saw another aircraft on a 1 1/2 mi final, and turned onto the base leg relative to that aircraft. Upon completion of the base turn, I spotted a second aircraft on final behind the one I had assumed we were to follow. At the same time, the tower instructed us to turn back to a downwind leg as there was another aircraft we were sequenced behind. I returned to a downwind leg to follow the second aircraft for landing. Observations: 1) the tower controller's workload was very heavy. 2) the tower controller should have advised us to extend the downwind leg, or let us know that he would 'instruct us when to turn to base leg.' 3) I should not have assumed the first aircraft was the one we were to follow. I should have asked for clarification. 4) the first officer was busy completing the final landing checklist, which was occupying the majority of his attention at the time. 5) our policy is to maximize 'see and avoid.' I noticed the second aircraft in time to avoid a near miss, even if the tower had failed to catch the developing problem.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CAPT OF A FALCON 20F TURNED ONTO BASE LEG TO FOLLOW WHAT HE BELIEVED TO BE THE ACFT TWR INSTRUCTED TO FOLLOW ON FINAL. HE NOTICED A SECOND ACFT ON FINAL AND STARTED TURNING BACK TO THE DOWNWIND LEG WHEN THE TWR CTLR INSTRUCTED HIM TO ALSO TURN BACK TO DOWNWIND AND TO FOLLOW THAT ACFT ON FINAL.

Narrative: WE WERE COMPLETING THE VOR-A APCH, CIRCLE OVERHEAD FOR A L DOWNWIND FOR RWY 19. ON MIDFIELD DOWNWIND, THE TWR ASKED US TO SLOW SPD FOR TFC AHEAD. I SLOWED TO APPROX 140 KTS. WE RECEIVED NO OTHER INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE TWR CTLR. I SAW ANOTHER ACFT ON A 1 1/2 MI FINAL, AND TURNED ONTO THE BASE LEG RELATIVE TO THAT ACFT. UPON COMPLETION OF THE BASE TURN, I SPOTTED A SECOND ACFT ON FINAL BEHIND THE ONE I HAD ASSUMED WE WERE TO FOLLOW. AT THE SAME TIME, THE TWR INSTRUCTED US TO TURN BACK TO A DOWNWIND LEG AS THERE WAS ANOTHER ACFT WE WERE SEQUENCED BEHIND. I RETURNED TO A DOWNWIND LEG TO FOLLOW THE SECOND ACFT FOR LNDG. OBSERVATIONS: 1) THE TWR CTLR'S WORKLOAD WAS VERY HVY. 2) THE TWR CTLR SHOULD HAVE ADVISED US TO EXTEND THE DOWNWIND LEG, OR LET US KNOW THAT HE WOULD 'INSTRUCT US WHEN TO TURN TO BASE LEG.' 3) I SHOULD NOT HAVE ASSUMED THE FIRST ACFT WAS THE ONE WE WERE TO FOLLOW. I SHOULD HAVE ASKED FOR CLARIFICATION. 4) THE FO WAS BUSY COMPLETING THE FINAL LNDG CHKLIST, WHICH WAS OCCUPYING THE MAJORITY OF HIS ATTN AT THE TIME. 5) OUR POLICY IS TO MAXIMIZE 'SEE AND AVOID.' I NOTICED THE SECOND ACFT IN TIME TO AVOID A NEAR MISS, EVEN IF THE TWR HAD FAILED TO CATCH THE DEVELOPING PROB.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.