37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 425565 |
Time | |
Date | 199901 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : grr |
State Reference | MI |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | ground other : taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 120 flight time total : 9000 flight time type : 2500 |
ASRS Report | 425565 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Prior to commencing the approach, I briefed the runway in use, ILS backup to a nighttime visual approach. The runway was plowed and sanded with braking action 'good.' I briefed an exit plan with a left turnoff of runway 8R. We received a visual approach clearance from 12 mi out and completed the approach and landing uneventfully. Exited the runway on a forward high speed A3 and tower said 'taxi to the gate and remain my frequency.' controller was working tower, ground and clearance delivery. She did not issue specific taxi instructions and left the taxi route selection up to us. Upon clearing the runway, the first officer and I accomplished our 'after landing flows' and I made a turn followed by a right onto taxiway F. I looked ahead and saw that the taxiway was plowed but narrower than usual. I slowed and asked the first officer if taxiway F to taxiway V was ok to get to the ramp. He said yes. After proceeding to the gate without incident, I consulted the airport diagram and found the 'fine print.' several txwys on the field were not stressed for large aircraft. Taxiway F was limited to 47000 pounds (about 1/2 of our actual weight). I do not believe we caused any damage to the surface of the taxiway and I noticed nothing unusual. Tower was busy issuing departure clrncs and said nothing about our taxi route. Factors that led to this event: failure to brief the restr txwys and a planned taxi route after the exit plan. The absence of a specific taxi clearance from the tower controller led to an ambiguity about taxiway selection. Failure to follow my first instinct upon noting the taxiway width and stopping the aircraft prior to entry before consulting the chart. Absence of signage noting weight restrs was a contributing factor, along with trusting my first officer to 'confirm' a valid taxi route. How to avoid a recurrence: brief the taxi route to be expected and note all 'fine print' items on the taxi diagram during approach/departure briefings. I plan on putting a red line through all unsuitable txwys on every diagram I use.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF ACR MLG EXCEEDING TXWY LIMIT WT AT GRR.
Narrative: PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE APCH, I BRIEFED THE RWY IN USE, ILS BACKUP TO A NIGHTTIME VISUAL APCH. THE RWY WAS PLOWED AND SANDED WITH BRAKING ACTION 'GOOD.' I BRIEFED AN EXIT PLAN WITH A L TURNOFF OF RWY 8R. WE RECEIVED A VISUAL APCH CLRNC FROM 12 MI OUT AND COMPLETED THE APCH AND LNDG UNEVENTFULLY. EXITED THE RWY ON A FORWARD HIGH SPD A3 AND TWR SAID 'TAXI TO THE GATE AND REMAIN MY FREQ.' CTLR WAS WORKING TWR, GND AND CLRNC DELIVERY. SHE DID NOT ISSUE SPECIFIC TAXI INSTRUCTIONS AND LEFT THE TAXI RTE SELECTION UP TO US. UPON CLRING THE RWY, THE FO AND I ACCOMPLISHED OUR 'AFTER LNDG FLOWS' AND I MADE A TURN FOLLOWED BY A R ONTO TXWY F. I LOOKED AHEAD AND SAW THAT THE TXWY WAS PLOWED BUT NARROWER THAN USUAL. I SLOWED AND ASKED THE FO IF TXWY F TO TXWY V WAS OK TO GET TO THE RAMP. HE SAID YES. AFTER PROCEEDING TO THE GATE WITHOUT INCIDENT, I CONSULTED THE ARPT DIAGRAM AND FOUND THE 'FINE PRINT.' SEVERAL TXWYS ON THE FIELD WERE NOT STRESSED FOR LARGE ACFT. TXWY F WAS LIMITED TO 47000 LBS (ABOUT 1/2 OF OUR ACTUAL WT). I DO NOT BELIEVE WE CAUSED ANY DAMAGE TO THE SURFACE OF THE TXWY AND I NOTICED NOTHING UNUSUAL. TWR WAS BUSY ISSUING DEP CLRNCS AND SAID NOTHING ABOUT OUR TAXI RTE. FACTORS THAT LED TO THIS EVENT: FAILURE TO BRIEF THE RESTR TXWYS AND A PLANNED TAXI RTE AFTER THE EXIT PLAN. THE ABSENCE OF A SPECIFIC TAXI CLRNC FROM THE TWR CTLR LED TO AN AMBIGUITY ABOUT TXWY SELECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW MY FIRST INSTINCT UPON NOTING THE TXWY WIDTH AND STOPPING THE ACFT PRIOR TO ENTRY BEFORE CONSULTING THE CHART. ABSENCE OF SIGNAGE NOTING WT RESTRS WAS A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR, ALONG WITH TRUSTING MY FO TO 'CONFIRM' A VALID TAXI RTE. HOW TO AVOID A RECURRENCE: BRIEF THE TAXI RTE TO BE EXPECTED AND NOTE ALL 'FINE PRINT' ITEMS ON THE TAXI DIAGRAM DURING APCH/DEP BRIEFINGS. I PLAN ON PUTTING A RED LINE THROUGH ALL UNSUITABLE TXWYS ON EVERY DIAGRAM I USE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.