37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 432840 |
Time | |
Date | 199903 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
State Reference | MI |
Altitude | msl single value : 4000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zmp.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | HS 125 Series 1-600 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 80 flight time total : 8200 flight time type : 200 |
ASRS Report | 432840 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : multi engine |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure non adherence other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Upon being cleared for a visual approach to bfa, I instructed my first officer to cancel our IFR flight plan. WX conditions at the time were clear skies with unrestr visibility. I was maintaining outside vigilance and was not keeping a constant watch over radio communications at the time of my instructions to my first officer. The only response that I heard from ATC was that we were cleared over to airport advisories. I believed at that time that my first officer had carried out my instruction and had indeed canceled IFR. Approximately 1 hour after landing, I was informed that ATC was looking for my aircraft. Factors that contributed to this incident are: 1) a relatively new first officer (new to the company). 2) a busy phase of flight. 3) the failure of the captain to maintain a constant watch over radio communications. Corrective actions that can be taken to prevent similar incidents: 1) the better use of cockpit coordination and crew resource management techniques.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN HS125 FAILED TO CANCEL IFR CLRNC AT DEST.
Narrative: UPON BEING CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO BFA, I INSTRUCTED MY FO TO CANCEL OUR IFR FLT PLAN. WX CONDITIONS AT THE TIME WERE CLR SKIES WITH UNRESTR VISIBILITY. I WAS MAINTAINING OUTSIDE VIGILANCE AND WAS NOT KEEPING A CONSTANT WATCH OVER RADIO COMS AT THE TIME OF MY INSTRUCTIONS TO MY FO. THE ONLY RESPONSE THAT I HEARD FROM ATC WAS THAT WE WERE CLRED OVER TO ARPT ADVISORIES. I BELIEVED AT THAT TIME THAT MY FO HAD CARRIED OUT MY INSTRUCTION AND HAD INDEED CANCELED IFR. APPROX 1 HR AFTER LNDG, I WAS INFORMED THAT ATC WAS LOOKING FOR MY ACFT. FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THIS INCIDENT ARE: 1) A RELATIVELY NEW FO (NEW TO THE COMPANY). 2) A BUSY PHASE OF FLT. 3) THE FAILURE OF THE CAPT TO MAINTAIN A CONSTANT WATCH OVER RADIO COMS. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS THAT CAN BE TAKEN TO PREVENT SIMILAR INCIDENTS: 1) THE BETTER USE OF COCKPIT COORD AND CREW RESOURCE MGMNT TECHNIQUES.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.