37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 440660 |
Time | |
Date | 199906 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Helicopter |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : atp pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 45 flight time total : 4000 flight time type : 800 |
ASRS Report | 440660 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | other personnel |
Qualification | other |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe maintenance problem : improper maintenance non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : inspection |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
When I came on duty, I noted that the 'mod 1' inspection was due in 3.7 hours. I accepted a flight which normally would have gotten us back within that period of time. On the final leg of the flight returning to the hangar, dispatch asked if we were available for another flight. I confirmed availability with the crew and calculated being back at the hangar within duty time limits and accepted the flight. We diverted from our in-flight location to the next hospital and transported the patient. Contributing factors: accepting the second flight without returning to the hangar. The tendency for maintenance to try and wait until the inspection is almost due before completing the work. Upon returning to the hangar I realized that I had overflown the 'mod 1' inspection by 2.4 hours.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A HELI IN AMBULANCE SVC WAS OPERATED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED MAINT CHK TIME EXCEEDED.
Narrative: WHEN I CAME ON DUTY, I NOTED THAT THE 'MOD 1' INSPECTION WAS DUE IN 3.7 HRS. I ACCEPTED A FLT WHICH NORMALLY WOULD HAVE GOTTEN US BACK WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME. ON THE FINAL LEG OF THE FLT RETURNING TO THE HANGAR, DISPATCH ASKED IF WE WERE AVAILABLE FOR ANOTHER FLT. I CONFIRMED AVAILABILITY WITH THE CREW AND CALCULATED BEING BACK AT THE HANGAR WITHIN DUTY TIME LIMITS AND ACCEPTED THE FLT. WE DIVERTED FROM OUR INFLT LOCATION TO THE NEXT HOSPITAL AND TRANSPORTED THE PATIENT. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: ACCEPTING THE SECOND FLT WITHOUT RETURNING TO THE HANGAR. THE TENDENCY FOR MAINT TO TRY AND WAIT UNTIL THE INSPECTION IS ALMOST DUE BEFORE COMPLETING THE WORK. UPON RETURNING TO THE HANGAR I REALIZED THAT I HAD OVERFLOWN THE 'MOD 1' INSPECTION BY 2.4 HRS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.