Narrative:

While being vectored for a visual approach to mke we were told to contact the final controller. The controller pointed out the traffic we were to follow. We said we had the traffic in sight. He then cleared us for the visual. The controller never told us to contact tower. We are also not sure if he had cleared us to land. When we landed, I keyed the microphone to let the controller know that we were clear of the runway. He then told us we were still on the approach frequency. Routinely the milwaukee controllers use 1 frequency or 1 controller for all approach, departure, tower, and ground at night or early in the morning. Without him telling us to contact tower we assumed he was working both frequencys.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLC OF A C650 LANDED WITHOUT CLRNC.

Narrative: WHILE BEING VECTORED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO MKE WE WERE TOLD TO CONTACT THE FINAL CTLR. THE CTLR POINTED OUT THE TFC WE WERE TO FOLLOW. WE SAID WE HAD THE TFC IN SIGHT. HE THEN CLRED US FOR THE VISUAL. THE CTLR NEVER TOLD US TO CONTACT TWR. WE ARE ALSO NOT SURE IF HE HAD CLRED US TO LAND. WHEN WE LANDED, I KEYED THE MIKE TO LET THE CTLR KNOW THAT WE WERE CLR OF THE RWY. HE THEN TOLD US WE WERE STILL ON THE APCH FREQ. ROUTINELY THE MILWAUKEE CTLRS USE 1 FREQ OR 1 CTLR FOR ALL APCH, DEP, TWR, AND GND AT NIGHT OR EARLY IN THE MORNING. WITHOUT HIM TELLING US TO CONTACT TWR WE ASSUMED HE WAS WORKING BOTH FREQS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.