37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 441814 |
Time | |
Date | 199906 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : btl.airport |
State Reference | MI |
Altitude | agl single value : 700 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : btl.tower tower : ilm.tower |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other vortac |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument non precision |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : btl.tower |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | controller : local |
Qualification | controller : non radar pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : instrument |
Experience | controller military : 3 controller non radar : 11 controller radar : 5 |
ASRS Report | 441814 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : cfi |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : took evasive action flight crew : executed go around |
Miss Distance | vertical : 200 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | other physical facility |
Airspace Structure | class d : btl.d |
Narrative:
I was working tower position at bil ATCT (contract tower). Landing and departure runway 5 and departure runway 31 from a displaced threshold (we had taxiway and runway closures due to wkend special event). Y (student solo) called 10 mi northwest inbound and was told to report 3 mi directly with a planned left traffic runway 5. X (cfii instrument student) called on a VOR runway 5 practice approach and was told to report FAF inbound. Y reported 3 mi west and was told to enter midfield left downwind (I would have sequenced him upon entering downwind). At this time, I had 3 CE172 closed pattern for touch-and-goes, another 3 or 4 entering the pattern or about to, departure to go and other inbounds holding outside class D airspace (the frequency was busy!). I missed the FAF report and called over I94 (2 mi southwest) and was told he was #2 following traffic ahead on final. Inquiring who the aircraft was on left base, Y (who never reported entering left downwind) said he had an aircraft above him on final approach. I told X to go around and aircraft Y (who had already flown through the final) to his altitude, fly straight ahead southeast to exit the pattern and re-enter on a midfield right downwind. X made left closed pattern and landed runway 5. Y entered right downwind and landed runway 5. Both being sequenced with other pattern traffic. X CFI later said his passing Y was quite close. At btl the tower is 2 mi from the threshold runway 5 and 3 mi from base leg. We are badly in need of d-brite tower radar (easily piped in from azo), but the FAA will wait until something worse happens. There has been yrs of talk about relocating the tower to a more central point on the airport. The flight school should be staggering their training sessions, instead of sending 15-20 aircraft out within 10 mins (every 1 1/2 hour) and we getting dumped on 1 hour later when they all want to come back in at the same time.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: DESCRIBING A BUSY TFC SESSION AT BTL ARPT, ATCT CTLR EXPLAINS WHY IT IS IMPORTANT THAT A D-BRITE RADAR IS NEEDED IN THE TWR.
Narrative: I WAS WORKING TWR POS AT BIL ATCT (CONTRACT TWR). LNDG AND DEP RWY 5 AND DEP RWY 31 FROM A DISPLACED THRESHOLD (WE HAD TXWY AND RWY CLOSURES DUE TO WKEND SPECIAL EVENT). Y (STUDENT SOLO) CALLED 10 MI NW INBOUND AND WAS TOLD TO RPT 3 MI DIRECTLY WITH A PLANNED L TFC RWY 5. X (CFII INST STUDENT) CALLED ON A VOR RWY 5 PRACTICE APCH AND WAS TOLD TO RPT FAF INBOUND. Y RPTED 3 MI W AND WAS TOLD TO ENTER MIDFIELD L DOWNWIND (I WOULD HAVE SEQUENCED HIM UPON ENTERING DOWNWIND). AT THIS TIME, I HAD 3 CE172 CLOSED PATTERN FOR TOUCH-AND-GOES, ANOTHER 3 OR 4 ENTERING THE PATTERN OR ABOUT TO, DEP TO GO AND OTHER INBOUNDS HOLDING OUTSIDE CLASS D AIRSPACE (THE FREQ WAS BUSY!). I MISSED THE FAF RPT AND CALLED OVER I94 (2 MI SW) AND WAS TOLD HE WAS #2 FOLLOWING TFC AHEAD ON FINAL. INQUIRING WHO THE ACFT WAS ON L BASE, Y (WHO NEVER RPTED ENTERING L DOWNWIND) SAID HE HAD AN ACFT ABOVE HIM ON FINAL APCH. I TOLD X TO GO AROUND AND ACFT Y (WHO HAD ALREADY FLOWN THROUGH THE FINAL) TO HIS ALT, FLY STRAIGHT AHEAD SE TO EXIT THE PATTERN AND RE-ENTER ON A MIDFIELD R DOWNWIND. X MADE L CLOSED PATTERN AND LANDED RWY 5. Y ENTERED R DOWNWIND AND LANDED RWY 5. BOTH BEING SEQUENCED WITH OTHER PATTERN TFC. X CFI LATER SAID HIS PASSING Y WAS QUITE CLOSE. AT BTL THE TWR IS 2 MI FROM THE THRESHOLD RWY 5 AND 3 MI FROM BASE LEG. WE ARE BADLY IN NEED OF D-BRITE TWR RADAR (EASILY PIPED IN FROM AZO), BUT THE FAA WILL WAIT UNTIL SOMETHING WORSE HAPPENS. THERE HAS BEEN YRS OF TALK ABOUT RELOCATING THE TWR TO A MORE CENTRAL POINT ON THE ARPT. THE FLT SCHOOL SHOULD BE STAGGERING THEIR TRAINING SESSIONS, INSTEAD OF SENDING 15-20 ACFT OUT WITHIN 10 MINS (EVERY 1 1/2 HR) AND WE GETTING DUMPED ON 1 HR LATER WHEN THEY ALL WANT TO COME BACK IN AT THE SAME TIME.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.