37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 457348 |
Time | |
Date | 199912 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bed.airport |
State Reference | MA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 1500 agl bound upper : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bed.tower |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | IAI1125 (Astra) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 11 |
Flight Phase | descent : vacating altitude descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : circling approach : instrument precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bed.tower |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Gulfstream II |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : vacating altitude |
Route In Use | approach : visual approach : traffic pattern |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 125 flight time total : 12000 flight time type : 250 |
ASRS Report | 457348 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure non adherence : required legal separation other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment : tcas other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : took precautionary avoidance action |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 1200 vertical : 500 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airspace Structure Weather Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error Inter Facility Coordination Failure |
Narrative:
My aircraft was cleared for a runway 11 ILS, circle to runway 5, then changed to straight in ILS runway 11. Inside LOM we got a TCASII warning and then RA as we broke out of the clouds. We saw a G2 turning base into and under us about 500 ft below. Being visual and with tower telling us to enter runway 5 pattern, we completed the landing on runway 5 as aircraft Y rolled out runway 11. There was a bad lack of coordination between boston and hanscom field tower allowing a VFR G2 to turn into a cleared astra on ILS final. This could have been an accident very easily. Please emphasize coordination between approach facilities and towers. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter, PIC, stated that they had made a call to the tower after the LOM had been passed, by about 1 mi or so. About that time they were breaking into VMC conditions, seeing the G2 on a right base. They performed a go around evasive action and the G2 landed runway 11 as planned. Reporter believes that the incident was based upon a lack of coordination between A90 approach controller and the tower at bed. The G2 was always there on a training flight. It was a marginal VFR day. Horizontal miss distance was about 1/4 mi or less.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN ASTRA CORPORATE PIC'S RPT ON A POSSIBLE NMAC WITH A G2 TURNING FINAL FOR RWY 11 WHILE 3 MI OUT ON ILS FINAL APCH TO RWY 11 AT BED, MA.
Narrative: MY ACFT WAS CLRED FOR A RWY 11 ILS, CIRCLE TO RWY 5, THEN CHANGED TO STRAIGHT IN ILS RWY 11. INSIDE LOM WE GOT A TCASII WARNING AND THEN RA AS WE BROKE OUT OF THE CLOUDS. WE SAW A G2 TURNING BASE INTO AND UNDER US ABOUT 500 FT BELOW. BEING VISUAL AND WITH TWR TELLING US TO ENTER RWY 5 PATTERN, WE COMPLETED THE LNDG ON RWY 5 AS ACFT Y ROLLED OUT RWY 11. THERE WAS A BAD LACK OF COORD BTWN BOSTON AND HANSCOM FIELD TWR ALLOWING A VFR G2 TO TURN INTO A CLRED ASTRA ON ILS FINAL. THIS COULD HAVE BEEN AN ACCIDENT VERY EASILY. PLEASE EMPHASIZE COORD BTWN APCH FACILITIES AND TWRS. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR, PIC, STATED THAT THEY HAD MADE A CALL TO THE TWR AFTER THE LOM HAD BEEN PASSED, BY ABOUT 1 MI OR SO. ABOUT THAT TIME THEY WERE BREAKING INTO VMC CONDITIONS, SEEING THE G2 ON A R BASE. THEY PERFORMED A GAR EVASIVE ACTION AND THE G2 LANDED RWY 11 AS PLANNED. RPTR BELIEVES THAT THE INCIDENT WAS BASED UPON A LACK OF COORD BTWN A90 APCH CTLR AND THE TWR AT BED. THE G2 WAS ALWAYS THERE ON A TRAINING FLT. IT WAS A MARGINAL VFR DAY. HORIZ MISS DISTANCE WAS ABOUT 1/4 MI OR LESS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.