37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 460052 |
Time | |
Date | 200001 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lax.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl single value : 18000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : sct.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | DC-10 30F |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer only : 24l |
Flight Phase | descent : vacating altitude descent : approach descent : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | arrival star : civet changed to mitts |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : atp |
ASRS Report | 460052 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : fmc/fms other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance none taken : insufficient time |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airspace Structure ATC Human Performance ATC Facility |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Intra Facility Coordination Failure Inter Facility Coordination Failure |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | procedure or policy : sct.tracon |
Airspace Structure | class b : lax.b |
Chart | star : civet |
Narrative:
Inbound to lax, cleared direct civet direct lax, expecting the usual civet arrival. Upon getting almost to civet, ATC cleared us to runway 24R, mitts arrival, direct snorkl, with several speed changes. It was way too close in for a STAR and runway change. We had to get the charts out, brief STAR, brief approach, load INS, navigation to snorkl. This could have been a setup for a dangerous situation for a crew which was not familiar with lax. I called the supervisor at socal. He was not very responsive and said 'that's the way we have to do it!' I told him it would help if the ATIS would announce the use of both the civet _______ stars. Also, the controller instructed an air carrier Y B737 to 'pull up alongside' our DC10. This is unsafe for several reasons including: 1) unbriefed formation flight per FARS, 2) causes TCASII RA. 3) wake turbulence issue for B737 behind DC10. ATC supervisor again discounted my safety concerns. These are recurring safety problems that ATC is unwilling to address.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: DC10 CREW RPTS MORE LATE CHANGES IN STAR AND RWY ASSIGNMENT WHILE ON CIVET ARR TO LAX.
Narrative: INBOUND TO LAX, CLRED DIRECT CIVET DIRECT LAX, EXPECTING THE USUAL CIVET ARR. UPON GETTING ALMOST TO CIVET, ATC CLRED US TO RWY 24R, MITTS ARR, DIRECT SNORKL, WITH SEVERAL SPD CHANGES. IT WAS WAY TOO CLOSE IN FOR A STAR AND RWY CHANGE. WE HAD TO GET THE CHARTS OUT, BRIEF STAR, BRIEF APCH, LOAD INS, NAV TO SNORKL. THIS COULD HAVE BEEN A SETUP FOR A DANGEROUS SIT FOR A CREW WHICH WAS NOT FAMILIAR WITH LAX. I CALLED THE SUPVR AT SOCAL. HE WAS NOT VERY RESPONSIVE AND SAID 'THAT'S THE WAY WE HAVE TO DO IT!' I TOLD HIM IT WOULD HELP IF THE ATIS WOULD ANNOUNCE THE USE OF BOTH THE CIVET _______ STARS. ALSO, THE CTLR INSTRUCTED AN ACR Y B737 TO 'PULL UP ALONGSIDE' OUR DC10. THIS IS UNSAFE FOR SEVERAL REASONS INCLUDING: 1) UNBRIEFED FORMATION FLT PER FARS, 2) CAUSES TCASII RA. 3) WAKE TURB ISSUE FOR B737 BEHIND DC10. ATC SUPVR AGAIN DISCOUNTED MY SAFETY CONCERNS. THESE ARE RECURRING SAFETY PROBS THAT ATC IS UNWILLING TO ADDRESS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.