Narrative:

We were on a scheduled flight from iad to sfo. We were rerted by ATC up to point reyes for 'sector balancing' then vectored by bay approach for an uncharted visual approach. Controller pointed out traffic, then told us to proceed direct brijj and cleared for visual runway 28R. Near brijj, controller asked us to look for additional traffic, which we were unable to acquire because of haze. We then realized we had lost sight of parallel traffic. We leveled off and told the controller we were going around. Controller said there was no need to go around because adequate separation exists, but we could go around if we wanted to, which we did. The controller gave us a heading and altitude and then a frequency change and a safe go around was accomplished. Adding to the problem was the fact that the traffic in close proximity to us was talking to a different controller on a different frequency. I think it is possible to maintain visual separation from more than 1 aircraft. Also, a high workload situation of configuring the airplane for landing and marginal visual conditions add to the problem. Supplemental information from acn 476655: approach points out traffic (B777) on extended final for runway 28L, 'plan to follow traffic, cleared visual runway 28R.' additional traffic for runway 28R is called out but cannot be seen due to sun in our eyes. As we approach brijj, it becomes obvious that our assigned speed was not capable to maintain a following position with the B777 which had already slowed and was talking to sfo tower. Our flight path resulted in passing above and in front of the B777.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B757 FLC ON VISUAL APCH SFO LOSES VISUAL CONTACT WITH SIDE-BY B777 AND INITIATES GAR.

Narrative: WE WERE ON A SCHEDULED FLT FROM IAD TO SFO. WE WERE RERTED BY ATC UP TO POINT REYES FOR 'SECTOR BALANCING' THEN VECTORED BY BAY APCH FOR AN UNCHARTED VISUAL APCH. CTLR POINTED OUT TFC, THEN TOLD US TO PROCEED DIRECT BRIJJ AND CLRED FOR VISUAL RWY 28R. NEAR BRIJJ, CTLR ASKED US TO LOOK FOR ADDITIONAL TFC, WHICH WE WERE UNABLE TO ACQUIRE BECAUSE OF HAZE. WE THEN REALIZED WE HAD LOST SIGHT OF PARALLEL TFC. WE LEVELED OFF AND TOLD THE CTLR WE WERE GOING AROUND. CTLR SAID THERE WAS NO NEED TO GO AROUND BECAUSE ADEQUATE SEPARATION EXISTS, BUT WE COULD GO AROUND IF WE WANTED TO, WHICH WE DID. THE CTLR GAVE US A HDG AND ALT AND THEN A FREQ CHANGE AND A SAFE GAR WAS ACCOMPLISHED. ADDING TO THE PROB WAS THE FACT THAT THE TFC IN CLOSE PROX TO US WAS TALKING TO A DIFFERENT CTLR ON A DIFFERENT FREQ. I THINK IT IS POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION FROM MORE THAN 1 ACFT. ALSO, A HIGH WORKLOAD SIT OF CONFIGURING THE AIRPLANE FOR LNDG AND MARGINAL VISUAL CONDITIONS ADD TO THE PROB. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 476655: APCH POINTS OUT TFC (B777) ON EXTENDED FINAL FOR RWY 28L, 'PLAN TO FOLLOW TFC, CLRED VISUAL RWY 28R.' ADDITIONAL TFC FOR RWY 28R IS CALLED OUT BUT CANNOT BE SEEN DUE TO SUN IN OUR EYES. AS WE APCH BRIJJ, IT BECOMES OBVIOUS THAT OUR ASSIGNED SPD WAS NOT CAPABLE TO MAINTAIN A FOLLOWING POS WITH THE B777 WHICH HAD ALREADY SLOWED AND WAS TALKING TO SFO TWR. OUR FLT PATH RESULTED IN PASSING ABOVE AND IN FRONT OF THE B777.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.