37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 477624 |
Time | |
Date | 200006 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bur.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl single value : 10000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : sct.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Caravan 1 208A |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Route In Use | enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp pilot : multi engine |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 7700 flight time type : 105 |
ASRS Report | 477624 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : engine fire warn. lite+bell |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : diverted to another airport |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
Intercepting V459 at the above listed location, I received an engine fire indication (EICAS warning light and horn). I attempted to confirm this indication and also requested a diversion to a close-by airport from socal approach. I explained that the reason for the diversion was an engine fire indication, and was advised by approach that bur and vny were close, and I requested vectors to bur. Approach advised me that both bur and vny were VFR, and since I did not observe any other evidence of fire (instrument indication, visible smoke or fire, degraded engine or aircraft performance, etc), I elected to continue engine operation, expedite my descent and land. I felt that a controled descent and landing, under power, was the safest action, also considering the proximity of high terrain and a dense urban environment. The landing was uneventful, and the postflt inspection confirmed the lack of fire and malfunction of the fire warning system.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A C208BG IN CRUISE AT 10000 FT DIVERTS TO BUR DUE TO ENG FIRE WARNING CAUSED BY A MALFUNCTIONING FIRE WARNING SYS.
Narrative: INTERCEPTING V459 AT THE ABOVE LISTED LOCATION, I RECEIVED AN ENG FIRE INDICATION (EICAS WARNING LIGHT AND HORN). I ATTEMPTED TO CONFIRM THIS INDICATION AND ALSO REQUESTED A DIVERSION TO A CLOSE-BY ARPT FROM SOCAL APCH. I EXPLAINED THAT THE REASON FOR THE DIVERSION WAS AN ENG FIRE INDICATION, AND WAS ADVISED BY APCH THAT BUR AND VNY WERE CLOSE, AND I REQUESTED VECTORS TO BUR. APCH ADVISED ME THAT BOTH BUR AND VNY WERE VFR, AND SINCE I DID NOT OBSERVE ANY OTHER EVIDENCE OF FIRE (INST INDICATION, VISIBLE SMOKE OR FIRE, DEGRADED ENG OR ACFT PERFORMANCE, ETC), I ELECTED TO CONTINUE ENG OP, EXPEDITE MY DSCNT AND LAND. I FELT THAT A CTLED DSCNT AND LNDG, UNDER PWR, WAS THE SAFEST ACTION, ALSO CONSIDERING THE PROX OF HIGH TERRAIN AND A DENSE URBAN ENVIRONMENT. THE LNDG WAS UNEVENTFUL, AND THE POSTFLT INSPECTION CONFIRMED THE LACK OF FIRE AND MALFUNCTION OF THE FIRE WARNING SYS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.