37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 492236 |
Time | |
Date | 200011 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : roa.airport |
State Reference | VA |
Altitude | msl single value : 38 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : roa.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 1 Eng, Retractable Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Route In Use | approach : instrument precision arrival : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : roa.tracon |
Make Model Name | Sundowner 23 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 182 flight time total : 1782 flight time type : 1782 |
ASRS Report | 492236 |
Person 2 | |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : published procedure non adherence : required legal separation |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted none taken : detected after the fact |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 0 vertical : 100 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance Aircraft |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
On IFR approach to roa in night VMC, with the field in sight, given vectors for sequence. Assigned heading 250 degrees and 3800 ft MSL, traffic (a commuter) called at our 12 O'clock position and reported in sight. Then assigned 240 degree heading, 3800 ft MSL with additional traffic at 9 O'clock position. I read back '240 degree heading, 3800 ft looking for traffic.' ATC shortly later asked me to 'say heading,' I replied '240 degree heading as assigned.' ATC advised they had assigned 140 degrees, so I turned to 140 degrees, advised that I had 'heard and read back 240 degrees' and advised 'sorry.' at this point I passed over traffic (a BEC23) about 100 ft below. Subsequently landed without incident. On the ground after landing the BEC23 pilot spoke with me and stated that he, too, had heard ATC assign 240 degrees to us and our read back of 240 degrees. He stated that we passed over him (he had us in sight) by 50 ft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MISINTERP OF A CLRNC LEADS TO AN NMAC.
Narrative: ON IFR APCH TO ROA IN NIGHT VMC, WITH THE FIELD IN SIGHT, GIVEN VECTORS FOR SEQUENCE. ASSIGNED HEADING 250 DEGS AND 3800 FT MSL, TFC (A COMMUTER) CALLED AT OUR 12 O'CLOCK POS AND RPTED IN SIGHT. THEN ASSIGNED 240 DEG HDG, 3800 FT MSL WITH ADDITIONAL TFC AT 9 O'CLOCK POS. I READ BACK '240 DEG HDG, 3800 FT LOOKING FOR TFC.' ATC SHORTLY LATER ASKED ME TO 'SAY HEADING,' I REPLIED '240 DEG HDG AS ASSIGNED.' ATC ADVISED THEY HAD ASSIGNED 140 DEGS, SO I TURNED TO 140 DEGS, ADVISED THAT I HAD 'HEARD AND READ BACK 240 DEGS' AND ADVISED 'SORRY.' AT THIS POINT I PASSED OVER TFC (A BEC23) ABOUT 100 FT BELOW. SUBSEQUENTLY LANDED WITHOUT INCIDENT. ON THE GND AFTER LNDG THE BEC23 PLT SPOKE WITH ME AND STATED THAT HE, TOO, HAD HEARD ATC ASSIGN 240 DEGS TO US AND OUR READ BACK OF 240 DEGS. HE STATED THAT WE PASSED OVER HIM (HE HAD US IN SIGHT) BY 50 FT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.